Wave function,probability,normalization,etc.

  • Thread starter Thread starter prehisto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the normalization of a wave function represented by f(px) = N*exp(-αpx) over the range from -∞ to ∞. The user attempts to find the normalization constant N by solving the integral of the squared function, but encounters a divergence issue. Responses clarify that the integral diverges and that the derived equation -N^2=1 is incorrect, as it would yield a negative value instead of the required normalization of +1. The importance of ensuring proper formulation of the integral is emphasized to achieve a valid normalization. Proper normalization is crucial for accurately determining the probability distribution and average values associated with the wave function.
prehisto
Messages
111
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


-∞<pi<∞
N-normalization multiple

f(px)=N*exp(-\alphapx)
1)normalize wave function to 1
2) find probability distrubution px
2) find avarage value and dispersion for px

Homework Equations



So for normalization i have to find N value when \int (from -∞ to ∞)[N*exp(-\alphapx)]^2=1
Am I right ?
either way when I am tried to solve this integral, i obtained -> -N^2=1
Could it be right ?

The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your integral diverges, are you sure there's no square or absolute value involved?
 
Goddar said:
Your integral diverges, are you sure there's no square or absolute value involved?

Right now i have only this example ,checked - there is nothing more to it.
I will check the source and let you know.
 
prehisto said:

Homework Statement


-∞<pi<∞
N-normalization multiple

f(px)=N*exp(-\alphapx)
1)normalize wave function to 1
2) find probability distrubution px
2) find avarage value and dispersion for px

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



So for normalization i have to find N value when \int (from -∞ to ∞)[N*exp(-\alphapx)]^2=1
Am I right?
Yes, that would be the normalization condition.

Either way when I tried to solve this integral, I obtained -> -N^2=1
Could it be right ?
No. First, as Goddar noted, the integral you wrote down diverges. Second, even if it didn't, your N would cause the integral to be negative, not +1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K