Wave Function_vibtrating nuclei

  • Thread starter Thread starter terp.asessed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclei Wave
terp.asessed
Messages
126
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


The Ground state wave function governing the motion of a pair of vibrating nuclei looks like:

wave function = wave (x) = (a/pi)1/4 e-ax2/2

where a = alpha = mu*w/(h bar), which is determined by mu = reduced mass of the pair
where w = angular vibrational frequency

...So, suppose the vibrating atoms in question were C and O. Compute what v~, the frequency of the vibration in cm-1, would have to be if the root-mean square fluctation in bond length were 0.035Angstom.

I lost track of the units for my solution, and I am not sure if I have done correctly...

Homework Equations


wave function = wave (x) = (a/pi)1/4 e-ax2/2

a = alpha = mu*w/(h bar), which is determined by mu = reduced mass of the pair

w = angular vibrational frequency

root mean square = <x2> - <x>2

The Attempt at a Solution


root mean square = <x2> - <x>2

where <x2> = integral (-infinite to infinite) wave(x) x2 wave(x) dx
= which I got 1/(2a) as a result

<x> = integral (x=o to L) p(x) x p(x) dx which I got as 0 in the end

so...I input:
root mean square = <x2> - <x>2 = 1/(2a) - 0 = 1/(2a)

since
root mean square = 0.035 angstrom = 1/(2a) and b/c a = mu*w/(h bar), I rearranged so that:

w = (h bar)/(0.07mu)...where mu = m1m2/(m1 + m2)

For mass of 1 C atom: 12.01g/(6.022x1023 atoms) x 1kg/103g = 1.99 x 10-26kg

For mass of 1 O atom: 16.00g/(6.022x1023 atoms) x 1kg/103g = 2.66 x 10-26kg

mu = 1.14 x 10-20kg

therefore w = (h/(2pi))1/(0.07mu) = 1.32 x 10-13 omega (is this right?) I know h has units of J*2 and mu = kg...but together they do NOT make omega...

therefore v~ = w/(2pi*c) where c = speed of light = 1.32 x 10-13 (assuming the unit is correct) / (2pi*3x108m/s) = 7.02 x 10-23 s-1

b/c I got lost track of units...I am not sure if the units in the solution is right...if someone could (1) explain the units in each calculations I did and then (2) give me hints as how to keep track of units for near future too, that would be so wonderful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You made a numerical error in your value of \mu. If your mass for a carbon atom is ~10-26kg and your mass for an oxygen atom is ~10-26kg, there's no way the reduced mass will be ~10-20kg. Fix that first. As for the units, Planck's constant \hbar is in J s (joule-seconds). Maybe breaking this (and everything else) down into base units (kg, m, s) will help. Just a heads up, you also forgot the "root" part of "root mean square."
 
Hello--thanks you for the reply--so, you're right, I miscalculated: μ = 1.14 x 10-26 kg

Also, since,
ℏ = J*s = kg*m2/s2...is omega a right unit for w?

w = (h/(2pi))1/(0.07mu) = 1.32 x 10-7 (J*s)/kg = 1.32 x 10-7 m2/s...? Did I make mistake? It is of acceleration unit, not velocity...
Aside, could you please clarify by what you mean by "root part of the root mean square"? If you could, thanks!
 
You're close with \hbar. Joules are kg*m2/s2 (you can remember this by recalling that joules are a measure of energy and kinetic energy is \frac{1}{2}mv^2), so J*s is kg*m2/s. Also, it's clear that you know that \mu has units of kg, but 0.07 also has units. This comes from the root mean square of distance, which, by the way, is \sqrt{\langle x^2 \rangle - \langle x \rangle ^2 } not just \langle x^2 \rangle - \langle x \rangle ^2 The units of rms distance are the same as the units of plain old distance, which in this case is just angstroms. Hopefully that should get you started.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top