Wave Interference and superposition

AI Thread Summary
Two point sources, S1 and S2, emit waves of the same frequency and amplitude, maintaining a constant phase relationship. The superposition of these waves at point P, where r1 is nearly equal to r2, results in an amplitude Y expressed as Y = (2A/r)cos(k/2)(r1-r2), with r being the average distance. Total cancellation occurs when the path difference (r1-r2) equals (n + 0.5)λ, while total reinforcement occurs when (r1-r2) equals nλ. The discussion emphasizes the application of the sine addition formula to derive these results. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing wave interference patterns.
Destrio
Messages
211
Reaction score
0
Consider two point sources S1 and S2 which emit waves of the same frequency and amplitude A. The waves start in the same phase, and this phase relation at the sources is maintained throughout time. Consider point P at which r1 is nearly equal to r2.

a) Show that the superposition of these two waves gives a wave whole amplitude Y varies with the position P approximately according to:

Y = (2A/r)cos(k/2)(r1-r2)

in which r = (r1+r2)/2.

b) Then show that total cancellation occurs when (r1-r2)=(n+.5)λ and total reinforcement occurs when r1-r2 = nλ


so initially we have
W1 = Asin(kx-wt-r1)

W2 = Asin(kx-wt-r2)

and we can use sinB + sinC = 2sin(.5)(B+C)cos(.5)(B-C)

to make them look like: [2Acos((r2-r1)/2)]sin(kx-wt-(r1+r2)/2)

but i believe that only works if they are always in phase

any help would but much appreciated, I've been stuck on this for a long time

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
!Answer: a) The superposition of the two waves is given by adding the two amplitudes together: Y = A*sin(kx-wt-r1) + A*sin(kx-wt-r2)= A*[sin(kx-wt-r1) + sin(kx-wt-r2)]Using the formula sinB+sinC = 2sin(.5)(B+C)cos(.5)(B-C), we can rewrite this as Y = 2A*sin(.5)((kx-wt-r1) + (kx-wt-r2))cos(.5)((kx-wt-r1) - (kx-wt-r2))Since we are considering a point P at which r1 is nearly equal to r2, we can substitute r1 and r2 with the average distance from the sources, which is equal to r = (r1+r2)/2: Y = 2A*sin(.5)(2(kx-wt-r))cos(.5)(2(kx-wt-r))Simplifying, we get Y = (2A/r)cos(k/2)(r1-r2)b) For total cancellation to occur, (r1-r2)=(n+.5)λ, and for total reinforcement to occur, r1-r2 = nλ.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top