Wave Nature of Light of Minerals

AI Thread Summary
Geologists utilize the wave nature of light and electromagnetic radiation to locate mineral deposits by analyzing interference patterns and conductivity contrasts in the Earth. Techniques such as inverse scattering methods involve sending low-frequency signals into the ground and measuring the scattered fields to create three-dimensional images of subsurface materials. These methods can identify areas with significant contrasts, such as ferrites, which exhibit high conductivity compared to surrounding rocks. The effectiveness of these techniques varies, but they are commonly employed in mineral and oil exploration. Understanding these principles can enhance the search for valuable mineral deposits.
wiccabean21
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm in my physics course right now and recently became interested in mineral deposits and my teacher told me to look into how geologists use the wave nature of light to find mineral deposists.. I am not sure if I am just really confused about the subject or if I just can't find anything
but can anyone help me with a general idea or show me where I can learn about this?!

please!
 
Science news on Phys.org
wiccabean21 said:
I'm in my physics course right now and recently became interested in mineral deposits and my teacher told me to look into how geologists use the wave nature of light to find mineral deposists.. I am not sure if I am just really confused about the subject or if I just can't find anything
but can anyone help me with a general idea or show me where I can learn about this?!

please!

perhaps something along the lines of beaming ELF waves (not VISIBLE spectrum of light but part of Electromagnetic radiation) into the Earth and watching for interference patterns(wave nature)?
Not sure I'll wait until someone more knowledgeable chimes in but I do recall reading something similar to what I just wrote...
 
Inverse scattering methods. There are a couple of things that we can do and I know a number of my advisor's former students have gone to work doing this kind of thing for oil companies. What they can do is have a low frequency antenna that sends out a signal and have a series of probes in the ground or receiving antennas on the surface. A few basic things they can do is assume that the ground is layered in something like air->soil->rock->oil->rock. Using measurements they can estimate the depth of the oil layer but that is a very coarse estimate. A better thing to do is have a distribution of receiving antennas and send out a pulse into the ground and measure the scattered fields at the antennas. Then they can use inverse scattering methods to try and get a three-dimensional image of the soil and find areas of high contrast that will indicate oil (or some other target material).

Certain mineral deposits would be easier. Ferrites will have high conductivity and thus present a very strong contrast to lower conductive rock. Mainly we are looking for contrasts in the conductivity and permittivity of the medium. Just how efficient these methods are I cannot say but I have done some theoretical work for a project along similar lines.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
764
Replies
41
Views
4K
Back
Top