Wave on a string meeting a boundary between areas of different densities

99wattr89
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
This is the problem I'm working on: http://i.imgur.com/PBMFG.png

I'm very behind with normal modes and waves, and I need to figure out how to do this sort of question in time for my exams, so I'm hoping that you guys will be able to help me see how this can be answered.

I've answered the first part, deriving he wave equation, but for the second part I'm feeling very lost. Can someone give me a hint or nudge in the right direction for how to get started with it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do it as two separate problems. Solve the wave equation for x< 0 with "X" amplitude at 0, for x> 0 with "X" amplitude at 0, then determine "X" so the function is continuous at x= 0.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Do it as two separate problems. Solve the wave equation for x< 0 with "X" amplitude at 0, for x> 0 with "X" amplitude at 0, then determine "X" so the function is continuous at x= 0.

Thank you for your reply!

I think I get the idea there, but unfortunately I'm not having much success doing it.

As I understand it, solving the wave equation means solving ∂2y/∂x∂t = 0

(I don't understand why you do that though. Am I wrong in thinking that's the way you solve the wave equation?)

To solve that, I differentiated y wrt x then t, to get ∂2y/∂x∂t = k1wAei(wt-k1x)

So then k1wAei(wt-k1x) = 0

But that would just mean that either A = 0 (which I'm pretty sure just means that there is no wave at all) or that w = 0 (which I think would mean that the wave doesn't move) or k1 = 0 (which I think would mean that the wavelength was infinite and so the wave would effectively be straight line). None of those possibilities seem like anything approaching a solution, so I think I'm doing this wrong.
 
I've been trying other things, but it still doesn't work.

I know that the amplitude of the reflected and incident waves added will equal the amplitude of the transmitted wave, and that dy/dx at 0 will also be equal for the sum of the incident and reflected waves, and the transmitted wave. But all that gives me is;

A +Areflected = Atransmitted

and

k1(A +Ar) = k2At

How can I get from this get to the answer?
 
Can anyone help me with this?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top