How Long Does a Point on a String Take to Move Between +2.0mm and -2.0mm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sdawg1969
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    String Wave
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time it takes for a point on a string to move between displacements of +2.0mm and -2.0mm, given the wave equation y(x,t)=(6.0mm)sin(kx+(600rad/s)t+Φ). The user correctly identifies that they need to solve for t using the sine function and the wave parameters. They derive equations for both displacements and attempt to find the time difference, ΔT, between the two positions. The user initially struggles with the calculation due to a calculator setting but ultimately resolves the issue, arriving at a time difference of approximately 0.00113 seconds. The thread highlights the importance of ensuring correct calculator settings when working with trigonometric functions in physics problems.
Sdawg1969
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If y(x,t)=(6.0mm)sin(kx+(600rad/s)t+\Phi) describes a wave traveling along a string, how much time does any given point on the string take to move between displacements y= +2.0mm and y= -2.0mm?



Homework Equations



I think y(t)=ym sin(\omegat) ?



The Attempt at a Solution



well if I plug in 2.0mm for y, 6.00mm for ym and 600rad/s for \omega I come up with the equation 2.0mm=6.00mm sin (600rad/s * t). Where do I go from here? are my assumptions correct so far?

Other things as I am thinking- 600rad/s is about 95.5Hz so each complete cycle from +6mm to -6mm should take .01s or so, so my answer should be less then that.

Thanks for your help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?
 
I think I have it- if I then take

sin^{}-1(2/6)=600*T1?

sin^{}-1(-2/6)=600*T2?

then \DeltaT is T1-T2?

does anyone have any input here?
 
pretty sure I've got it-

y1(x,t)=ym*sin(kx+600t1+\Phi)

2.00mm=6.00mm*sin(kx+600t1+\Phi)

sin^{}-1(1/3)=kx+600t1+\Phi

y2(x,t)=ym*sin(kx+600t2+\Phi)

-2.00mm=6.00mm*sin(kx+600t2+\Phi)

sin^{}-1(-1/3)=kx+600t2+\Phi

so...
[sin^{}-1(1/3)]-[sin^{}-1(-1/3)]=(kx+600t1+\Phi)-(kx+600t2+\Phi)

and...
[sin^{}-1(1/3)]-[sin^{}-1(-1/3)]=600t1-600t2

finally,

([sin^{}-1(1/3)]-[sin^{}-1(-1/3)])/600=t1-t2

do the math and \Deltat is .00113s

I think this is solved
 
no one ever responded to this guys problem, and now I'm actually trying to solve this as well and i tried doing the method he ended up using but i am not getting a correct answer. Although his method for the most part looks right and makes sense to me, the only thing I figure would be the problem is that x isn't a constant so they should cancel i don't think...but I'm not sure what else to do with so many unknown variables...any help?
 
oops nevermind...my calculator was in degree mode instead of radian mode
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top