Why Do Longer Wavelengths Diffract More Than Shorter Wavelengths?

AI Thread Summary
Longer wavelengths diffract more than shorter wavelengths due to their ability to bend around obstacles and spread out when passing through openings, which is a fundamental property of wave behavior. The relationship between wavelength and image sharpness is highlighted by electron microscopes, which utilize shorter wavelengths to achieve higher resolution images. This is because shorter wavelengths can resolve finer details, allowing for clearer imaging of small objects. The discussion also touches on the mathematical derivation of minima in single-slit diffraction, emphasizing the importance of understanding these principles in wave physics. Overall, the conversation seeks clarity on the mechanisms behind diffraction and resolution related to wavelength.
Yuqing
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
I've been told that longer wavelengths are able to diffract more than short wavelengths. The hyperphysics page on sound wave diffraction also states this fact. Nothing I've read have explained why exactly longer wavelengths are able to diffract more than shorter wavelengths, so that's my question here.

Also, the hyperphysics page also mentions about wavelengths and their ability to transfer information. Electron microscopes are able to produce images of smaller items because the wavelength of the electron is smaller than visible light. How does a shorter wavelength help to produce a sharper image?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yuqing said:
I've been told that longer wavelengths are able to diffract more than short wavelengths. The hyperphysics page on sound wave diffraction also states this fact. Nothing I've read have explained why exactly longer wavelengths are able to diffract more than shorter wavelengths, so that's my question here.

Have you seen the derivation for locating the minima in a single-slit diffraction experiment? What is the equation? Let m = 1, and then solve for theta, which is the angle from the central axis to the point at the first minima.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top