Wavelength - how far away did earthquake occur

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance of an earthquake based on the arrival times of P and S waves at a seismic station, which are detected 1.0 minute apart. Using the speeds of 8.9 km/s for P waves and 5.8 km/s for S waves, the equations derived help to express the relationship between distance and time. The key steps involve solving for the time difference and substituting it into the equations to eliminate unknowns. The algebraic manipulation leads to a formula that calculates the distance based on the wave speeds and the time difference. Ultimately, the solution confirms that the difference in travel times directly correlates to the distance from the earthquake's epicenter.
mathcrzy
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Assuming typical speeds of 8.9 km/s and 5.8 km/s for P and S waves, respectively, how far away did the earthquake occur if a particular seismic station detects the arrival of these two types of waves 1.0 min apart?
_____km


Homework Equations



v=(lamba)(f)
1/T=frequncy
lamba=one wave length
T=period

X=same

Vpwave=deltaX/T

Vswave=dletaX/T+60

The Attempt at a Solution



8.9=

5.8=
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathcrzy said:
Vpwave=deltaX/T = 8.9 km/sec

Vswave=dletaX/T+60 = 5.8 km/sec

This is basically what you need. Solve the first equation for an expression for T and substitute it into the second equation, so you can eliminate the unknown T. You now have an equation you can solve for deltaX.

[As a check, consider this. Both types of waves started from the same "source". About how much do the P-waves gain on the S-waves each second? How much longer do the S-waves need to make up the difference? How long will it take for the S-waves to be a full minute behind? How far will the P-waves have traveled in that time? The algebraic solution described above is equivalent to answering these questions.]
 
Last edited:
Vp=deltaX/T
VpT=deltaX
T=deltaX/Vp

Vs=deltaX/T+60
Vs(T+60)=deltaX
VsT+Vs60=deltaX
T=deltaX-Vs60/Vp

deltaX-Vs60/Vp=deltaX/Vp
deltaX-Vs60=deltaX
deltaX=Vs60

Is this how you solve for deltaX
 
mathcrzy said:
Vp=deltaX/T
VpT=deltaX
T=deltaX/Vp

Vs=deltaX/T+60
Vs(T+60)=deltaX
VsT+Vs60=deltaX

You were OK to here. The next line would then be

T = (deltaX - Vs·60)/Vs ,

so from there,

(deltaX - Vs·60)/Vs=deltaX/Vp

(deltaX/Vs) - (deltaX/Vp) = 60

(deltaX) · [ (1/Vs) - (1/Vp) ] = 60

delta X = [ (Vs·Vp) / (Vp - Vs) ] · 60
 
i got the answer but just wondering how you got from:

(deltaX - Vs·60)/Vs=deltaX/Vp

to

(deltaX/Vs) - (deltaX/Vp) = 60
 
(deltaX - Vs·60)/Vs = deltaX/Vp

(deltaX)/Vs - (Vs·60)/Vs = deltaX/Vp

(deltaX)/Vs - (60) = deltaX/Vp

(deltaX/Vs) - (deltaX/Vp) = 60

In fact, you could really start right from here because this just says that the difference between the time it takes the S-waves to reach the station and the time it takes for the P-waves to do so is 60 seconds.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top