Waves and A Fisherman on a boat

  • Thread starter Thread starter Punkyc7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boat Waves
Click For Summary
The wave equation describes a water wave traveling on a lake, and the time for one complete wave pattern to pass a stationary fisherman is calculated using the formula 2π/5.4, resulting in approximately 1.16 seconds. The horizontal distance traveled by the wave crest during this time involves determining the wavelength, which is calculated as 2π divided by the wave number (0.0045 m^-1), yielding a wavelength of approximately 1396.263 meters. It is clarified that the wave number is not the speed of the wave, and the relationship between time and wavelength is confirmed as intuitive. The calculations align correctly with the physics of wave motion. The discussion emphasizes understanding the relationship between wave properties and their implications for a stationary observer.
Punkyc7
Messages
415
Reaction score
0
a water wave is traveling in a straight line on a lake is described by the equation
y(x,t)=.0375mcos(.0045 m^-1 (x) + 5.4 s^-1 (t))

How much time does it take for one complete wave pattern to go past a fisherman in a boat at anchor, and what is the horizontal distance does the wave crest travel in that time.

My question is about the second part of the question.

for the first part I got 2Pi/5.4=t

so for the horizontal distance is it just .0045*((2Pi)/5.4)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, because 0.0045 m^-1 isn't the speed of the wave (and it doesn't have the right units).

0.0045 m^-1 is k and wavelength is 2*pi/k. Is it intuitive that one wavelength passes the fisherman in the time it takes a complete cycle to go past?
 
So was my time right?

so if lambda = 2*pi/k

would that mean the distance would be 1396.263?
 
Yes.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K