Waves on Tight Strings: Boundary Condition Problem

MattMark'90
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A string is attached to a ring of mass m which is free to move up and down a frictionless pole. The string is subject to tension T and its mass per unit length is \rho. The displacement of the string from its equilibrium position along the x -axis is y(x,t).

The boundary condition at the ring, provided \frac{\delta y}{\delta x}<<1, is

T \frac{\delta y}{\delta x}(0,t) = m \frac{\delta^{2} y}{\delta t^{2}}(0,t)​

(i) This boundary condition is the consequence of which physical law?
(ii) For the case of an incident wave y(x,t) = e^{i(-kx-\omega t)}, where \frac{\omega}{k} = \sqrt{\frac{T}{\rho}}, write the total displacement as;

y(x,t) = e^{i(-kx-\omega t)} + re^{i(kx-\omega t)}​

Using the general boundary condition, find r as a function of k and m.

Homework Equations



I think everything needed to solve this question is included in the problem description.

The Attempt at a Solution



(i) I believe the boundary condition is a consequence of Newton's Second Law of Motion; the forces acting on a element of string are equated to mass times acceleration. The slope of the string is equal is equal to the tension, however, I do not understand why the left hand side is multiplied by Tension.

(ii) I have calculated the first and second derivatives wrt to x and t respectively and at x=0, the boundary condition has the following form;

T(-k +kr)ie^{i(-\omega t)} = m(-\omega^{2} -\omega^{2}r)e^{i(-\omega t)

Cancelling the exponents this gives;
T(-k +kr)i = m(-\omega^{2} -\omega^{2}r)

From here I have tried using the relationship given in the problem statement to eliminate T but just end up introducing another unwanted variable. I cannot seem to form a relationship involving only k and m.
Since I need a real answer I suppose I need to remove the complex numbers in the LHS of the equation but don't see how I could achieve this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(i) Well the simplest answer is that the derivative is unitless and you need T to give it units of force. More detailed answer is that you originally have tension T, and you describe dy/dx as the y-component of the force T. So the total force in the y-direction is T*dy/dx

(ii) Can't help you here. I also get a \rho term in the equation.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top