Wear rates and friction of plastics

  • Thread starter Thread starter es_shoes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a plastic alternative to brass and steel components with ceramic tips, specifically seeking materials with comparable wear rates to ceramic. Vespel is suggested as a viable option, although it may not match ceramic's wear resistance. The application involves a non-rotating bearing-shaft setup that will only experience slight vertical movement under its own weight. Participants emphasize the importance of consulting with an applications expert to address specific speed and load requirements. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for durable, low-friction plastics suitable for precise measurement applications.
es_shoes
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am looking to replace a set of brass and steel sleeve and cylinder having a ceramic tip with a plastic sleeve and cylinder having a plastic tip. The only question I have actually has two parts... are there any plastic, machineable materials that have comparable wear rates to that of ceramic? The probe enclosed on this setup works off the Eddy current, so the tip can't be metal. Just wondering if anything pops out at you guys for a strong plastic with good wear rates, and low friction between two layers of that material. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd certainly look at Vespel. It won't wear as well as ceramic (what will!), but it's pretty good. You're probably going to want to talk to an applications guy about bearing-shaft issues. You'll need to have speed and radial load specs when you do.
 
I definitely will look at Vespel, thanks. The good part about the bearing-shaft setup is that it won't rotate like a wheel bearing, it will just move up and down slightly (its own weight is the only load)- to allow for measurement of changes of web thickness- from 0 to 10 mils. Thanks again.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top