Wear rates and friction of plastics

  • Thread starter Thread starter es_shoes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a plastic alternative to brass and steel components with ceramic tips, specifically seeking materials with comparable wear rates to ceramic. Vespel is suggested as a viable option, although it may not match ceramic's wear resistance. The application involves a non-rotating bearing-shaft setup that will only experience slight vertical movement under its own weight. Participants emphasize the importance of consulting with an applications expert to address specific speed and load requirements. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for durable, low-friction plastics suitable for precise measurement applications.
es_shoes
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am looking to replace a set of brass and steel sleeve and cylinder having a ceramic tip with a plastic sleeve and cylinder having a plastic tip. The only question I have actually has two parts... are there any plastic, machineable materials that have comparable wear rates to that of ceramic? The probe enclosed on this setup works off the Eddy current, so the tip can't be metal. Just wondering if anything pops out at you guys for a strong plastic with good wear rates, and low friction between two layers of that material. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd certainly look at Vespel. It won't wear as well as ceramic (what will!), but it's pretty good. You're probably going to want to talk to an applications guy about bearing-shaft issues. You'll need to have speed and radial load specs when you do.
 
I definitely will look at Vespel, thanks. The good part about the bearing-shaft setup is that it won't rotate like a wheel bearing, it will just move up and down slightly (its own weight is the only load)- to allow for measurement of changes of web thickness- from 0 to 10 mils. Thanks again.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top