Weighing In on Different Planets: Radii and Mass

AI Thread Summary
A planet with a larger radius but the same mass as Earth would result in a lower gravitational pull due to the increased distance from the planet's center. Gravity decreases with the square of the distance, meaning that if the radius is three times larger, the gravitational force experienced would be reduced to one-ninth of what it is on Earth. This is because a larger radius implies a more hollow structure, leading to a weaker gravitational attraction. Therefore, a person's weight would decrease significantly on such a planet. Understanding the relationship between mass, radius, and gravity is crucial to grasping these concepts.
lep007
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose you went to another planet having a larger radius than Earth but having the same total mass as Earth. Would this affect your weight? How?


Homework Equations


Not applicable...? I think.


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't really understand what radius and mass has to do with weight, sorry.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the forum. There are some eqns that could be of value, but for now do you know how gravity varies with distance?
 
I think the gravitational force should get smaller when the distance becomes larger, right?
 
indeed it does, and in fact is an example where it falls with the square of the distance, that is twice as far, 1/4 the force. What you likely are not acquainted with is the idea Newton developed that if you could condense all the matter of the Earth into a small marble in the center, gravitational force would be the same as it is now.
 
I'm sort of confused; I know the one's mass wouldn't change, but if the radius was 3x larger than Earth's and yet the mass of the planet was the same, the planet would be more hollow, which means a lesser pull of gravity, which means weight would decrease?
 
bingo! the force from the mass in both cases is the same--picture those marbles of high density matter in the center and a person "standing" at R distance and 3R. The weight would be 1/9 on the fluffier planet.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top