Weighing yourself in the elevator

  • Thread starter Thread starter test2morrow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elevator Weighing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the weight reading on a spring scale when a person accelerates upward in an elevator. The individual weighs 600N at rest, indicating a mass of 60kg. When accelerating upward at 2 m/s², the correct calculation for the scale reading is W = m(g + a), resulting in a reading of 720N. While the professor used a different method involving forces, both approaches lead to the same conclusion. Understanding both methods provides clarity on how to solve similar physics problems.
test2morrow
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Need help:Weighing yourself in the elevator-acceleration problem

Homework Statement



If you stand on a spring scale in your bathroom at home, it reads 600N, which means your mass is 60kg. If instead, you stand on the scale while accelerating at 2 m/s^2 upward in an elevator, what would the scale read?

a. 120N
b. 480N
c. 600N
d. 720N


Homework Equations




W=mg


The Attempt at a Solution



So I asked my professor this question and he came up with some complicated answer that I didn't really understand. My own logic was that W=mg, W=60kg * (2m/s^2+9.8m/s^2), W=720N which is the correct answer. However, this is not the same steps the professor used which was something like F=N-W=ma and he did some subtraction work and somehow got 720N.

So can somebody explain to me the correct way to solve this problem?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


test2morrow said:

Homework Statement



If you stand on a spring scale in your bathroom at home, it reads 600N, which means your mass is 60kg. If instead, you stand on the scale while accelerating at 2 m/s^2 upward in an elevator, what would the scale read?

a. 120N
b. 480N
c. 600N
d. 720N

Homework Equations



W=mg

The Attempt at a Solution


So I asked my professor this question and he came up with some complicated answer that I didn't really understand. My own logic was that W=mg, W=60kg * (2m/s^2+9.8m/s^2), W=720N which is the correct answer. However, this is not the same steps the professor used which was something like F=N-W=ma and he did some subtraction work and somehow got 720N.

So can somebody explain to me the correct way to solve this problem?

That works too of course.

The 60 kg student is accelerating upward at 2 m/s2. The Normal force of the student less the gravitational weight must yield an m*a of the same acceleration as the floor.
N is what the spring will register and rearranging that normal force = m*a + W = m*(g + a)

Your way works fine as well.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top