Weight distribution of 2 configurations

  • Thread starter member 534986
  • Start date
  • #1
TV Weight distribution 02b 500h.jpg


Say Object-A weighs 100 lbs.
In Figure-1, it's obvious that the weight distribution is even along the bottom edge of Rectangle-B.

In Figure-2, ignoring the weight of the white objects, is the weight distribution exactly the same along the bottom edge of Rectangle-B as it is in Figure-1?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
berkeman
Mentor
64,437
15,787
What do you think, and why? Are you familiar with how to draw Free Body Diagrams (FBDs) and sum forces and moments?
 
  • #3
A.T.
Science Advisor
11,753
3,034
Summary:: Weight distribution

View attachment 253509

Say Object-A weighs 100 lbs.
In Figure-1, it's obvious that the weight distribution is even along the bottom edge of Rectangle-B.

In Figure-2, ignoring the weight of the white objects, is the weight distribution exactly the same along the bottom edge of Rectangle-B as it is in Figure-1?
Hint: The moments around the center of mass must balance in both cases.
 
  • #4
What do you think, and why? Are you familiar with how to draw Free Body Diagrams (FBDs) and sum forces and moments?
Nope. I'm just a curious senior. This is not a homework problem.
 
  • #5
Hint: The moments around the center of mass must balance in both cases.
You totally lost me. I'm just a curious senior hoping for an explanation from the gurus.
 
  • #6
berkeman
Mentor
64,437
15,787
You totally lost me. I'm just a curious senior hoping for an explanation from the gurus.
It's good to be curious. Google "sum of moments" and "free body diagram".

Senior in high school? :smile:
 
  • #7
It's good to be curious. Google "sum of moments" and "free body diagram".

Senior in high school? :smile:
Nope, senior as in 79 years old.
 
  • #8
berkeman
Mentor
64,437
15,787
Nope, senior as in 79 years old.
Ah, got it, LOL.

What is your math background? It doesn't take advanced math to work out a sum of moments (a moment is basically a torque, multiplying the force by the lever arm length, and ratioed to the angle that the force is applied at the end of the lever arm).

Here is a basic article about FBDs:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_body_diagram

And here are the Google search results for Sum of Moments:

https://www.google.com/search?q=sum...VCMH0KHXDbAcMQ_AUIDCgA&biw=1206&bih=564&dpr=1

which includes a couple instruction videos on how to apply the sum of moments to solve a statics problem like the one you have asked about. :smile:
 
  • #9
22,418
5,252
Summary:: Weight distribution

View attachment 253509

Say Object-A weighs 100 lbs.
In Figure-1, it's obvious that the weight distribution is even along the bottom edge of Rectangle-B.
This is not correct. The force distribution along the bottom edge of rectangle B in Figure 1 is not uniform. It is higher toward the center than towards the edges.

Have you ever had a course in calculus? If you are talking about the force distribution along the bottom edge, are you comfortable with the idea that the force distribution is described by the local value of the upward force per unit width?
 
  • #10
This is not correct. The force distribution along the bottom edge of rectangle B in Figure 1 is not uniform. It is higher toward the center than towards the edges.

Have you ever had a course in calculus? If you are talking about the force distribution along the bottom edge, are you comfortable with the idea that the force distribution is described by the local value of the upward force per unit width?
Let me reword my statement.

"In Figure-1, if 2 small blocks of wood are placed underneath Rectangle-B, one flush with the left edge and the other flush with the right edge, then the weight pressing on each block would be identical assuming the load is directly in the center of Rectangle-B."

Will the same condition exist in Figure-2?
 
  • #11
berkeman
Mentor
64,437
15,787
Will the same condition exist in Figure-2?
What do you think and why? (Have you actuially been reading the links and hints we have been giving you? )
 
  • #12
Yes, I googled the suggestions but could not figure out the answer to my question. That's OK. I didn't come here for a physics lesson. I should have known better having read replies to questions from other people. I just hoped for an answer but it's like pulling teeth.

I understand that gurus here don't want to give answers. Only to guide people to figuring out the answers for themselves. No problem with that. It's just not my goal at 79 years.

Bye physicsforum. There's no point in my returning.
 
  • #13
berkeman
Mentor
64,437
15,787
I understand that gurus here don't want to give answers. Only to guide people to figuring out the answers for themselves. No problem with that. It's just not my goal at 79 years.
Thanks for the complement. That is indeed what we try to do. Best wishes.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
  • #14
berkeman
Mentor
64,437
15,787
BTW, I think I asked a couple times what you think about the problem, but I don't think you replied to that. I know what I think intuitively and with just basic visualization of what would happen, but I'd need to do the FBDs and calculations to be sure.

Can you say what you feel intuitively would happen (before you leave us)? Thanks.
 

Suggested for: Weight distribution of 2 configurations

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
303
  • Last Post
2
Replies
46
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
534
Replies
8
Views
489
Replies
4
Views
383
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • Last Post
6
Replies
202
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
358
Top