How Does Weight Loss Affect the Orbital Period of a Satellite?

AI Thread Summary
Weight loss in an isolated system, such as an artificial satellite, does not affect the satellite's orbital period. The mass of the satellite remains constant as long as the waste produced is retained within the system. Even if body weight is lost, the overall mass of the satellite does not change significantly, as the mass lost through exercise is negligible. The orbital period is primarily determined by the mass of the planet being orbited and the radius of the orbit, not the mass of the satellite itself. Therefore, individual weight loss has no impact on the satellite's orbital dynamics.
aalmighty
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I weigh 200 pounds today on earth, now I go Into an Isolated System (Say, an artificial Satellite) for six months, I eat healthy foods, drink a lot of water and regularly exercize (due to lack of anything else to do :D), so I'll lose weight, and hence mass.

1) Will there be any change in the time period of the satellite?

2) If not, which means the satellite has the same mass as when it was launched, where is the mass that I lost by exercizing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if your waste isn't thrown out of the space station, but kept on, the overall mass of the station will never change as long as you stay on...
 
Over 100 days your body will have radiated away the equivalent of roughly 10 mcg of mass. :)
 
moose said:
Well, if your waste isn't thrown out of the space station, but kept on, the overall mass of the station will never change as long as you stay on...

and even if you did toss the waste (or the lost body weight), the mass of the satellite has (virtually) nothing to do with the orbital period. it's the mass of the planet the satellite is going around (as well as the radius of orbit, assuming a circular orbit) that controls the period.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top