Weighted Moving Average of Cubic

  • Thread starter Thread starter Scootertaj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Average Cubic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying a second-order weighted moving average to a cubic polynomial, specifically examining the polynomial X_t = a_0 + a_1t + a_2t^2 + a_3t^3. Participants are exploring whether this application alters the polynomial's form and discussing the implications of the weighting factors involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the relationship between the weighted moving average and the cubic polynomial, questioning how the weighting factors affect the outcome. There are inquiries about specific variables such as L and I_4, as well as the rearrangement of weights into a specific form.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing insights and clarifications about the mathematical expressions involved. Some have proposed specific calculations and relationships that need to be satisfied for the polynomial to remain unchanged, while others are seeking further clarification on the definitions and roles of certain variables.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions of I_2 and I_4, as well as the implications of the arbitrary choice of L in the context of the problem. Participants are also considering the conditions under which the polynomial retains its form after applying the moving average.

Scootertaj
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
1. Show that applying a second-order weighted moving average to a cubic polynomial will not change anything.
X_t = a_0 + a_1t + a_2t^2 + a_3t^3 is our polynomial
Second-order weighted moving average: \sum_{i=-L}^{i=L} B_iX_{t+i}
where B_i=(1-i^2I_2/I_4)/(2L+1-I_2^{2}/I_4)
where I_2=\sum_{i=-L}^{i=L} i^2

2. I did a similar problem where applying a linear moving average to a linear equation returns the same thing, but I'm not sure how to proceed here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Scootertaj said:
1. Show that applying a second-order weighted moving average to a cubic polynomial will not change anything.
X_t = a_0 + a_1t + a_2t^2 + a_3t^3 is our polynomial
Second-order weighted moving average: \sum_{i=-L}^{i=L} B_iX_{t+i}
where B_i=(1-i^2I_2/I_4)/(2L+1-I_2^{2}/I_4)
where I_2=\sum_{i=-L}^{i=L} i^2

2. I did a similar problem where applying a linear moving average to a linear equation returns the same thing, but I'm not sure how to proceed here.

What is L supposed to be in your case?
 
L is any arbitrary number.
For any L, this should be true.
 
Scootertaj said:
...

where I_2=\sum_{i=-L}^{i=L} i^2
...

What is I4 ?
 
Sorry, it just follows the same pattern as I2:

I_4=\sum_{i=-L}^{i=L} i^{4}
 
Scootertaj said:
1. Show that applying a second-order weighted moving average to a cubic polynomial will not change anything.
X_t = a_0 + a_1t + a_2t^2 + a_3t^3 is our polynomial
Second-order weighted moving average: \sum_{i=-L}^{i=L} B_iX_{t+i}
where B_i=(1-i^2I_2/I_4)/(2L+1-I_2^{2}/I_4)
where I_2=\sum_{i=-L}^{i=L} i^2

2. I did a similar problem where applying a linear moving average to a linear equation returns the same thing, but I'm not sure how to proceed here.

So you have weighting factors of the form
B_i = A - B i^2, i=-L, \ldots, L. What happens when you compute
\sum_{i=-L}^{L} (A - B i^2) [a_0 + a_1 (t+i) + a_2 (t+i)^2 + a_3 (t+i)^3]?
 
Ray Vickson said:
So you have weighting factors of the form
B_i = A - B i^2, i=-L, \ldots, L. What happens when you compute
\sum_{i=-L}^{L} (A - B i^2) [a_0 + a_1 (t+i) + a_2 (t+i)^2 + a_3 (t+i)^3]?

I'm unsure as to how you rearranged the weights to get B_i = A - B i^2, would you mind clarifying what A and Bi2 are?
 
Last edited:
I mean, one way to write what we have is
\frac{1}{2L+1-I_2^{2}/I_4} \sum_{i=-L}^{i=L} (1-i^2\frac{I_2}{I_4}) [a_0 + a_1 (t+i) + a_2 (t+i)^2 + a_3 (t+i)^3]
 
I THINK I may have got it. I basically looked at what we had, and what we need.

In order for us to get back a0, for example, we need:

\frac{1}{2L+1-\frac{I_2^{2}}{I_4}}\sum_{i=-L}^{i=L}a_0(1-i^2\frac{I_2}{I_4}) = a_0
Well, let's multiply through:

\frac{a_0}{2L+1-\frac{I_2^{2}}{I_4}}\sum_{i=-L}^{i=L} 1 - a_0\frac{\sum_{i=-L}^{i=L} i^2\frac{I_2}{I_4}}{2L+1-\frac{I_2^{2}}{I_4}}
\frac{a_0(2L+1) - a_0\frac{I_2^{2}}{I_4}}{2L+1-\frac{I_2^{2}}{I_4}} = a_0

Then, do the same for the rest.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K