Heffernana
- 2
- 0
I'm trying to understand induced representation / little group stuff in Weinberg QFT vol. 1 chapter 2 (around page 64, 65, 66). So is this the correct way of thinking about it:
We have the Poincaré group of symmetries; we wish to know how to represent operators (derived from these symmetries) that act on physical states, \Psi, in the Hilbert space.
Since 4-momenta - p - commute as shown in the Lie Algebra of the group, classify the state-vectors according to p and someother quantities \sigma. Then use a Lorentz transformation to re-write a general momentum state \Psi_{p,\sigma} in terms of a finite number of distinct "standard momenta" k_{\mu}, as in equation (2.5.5). This standard momentum k_{\mu} is invariant under a certain group symmetry W^{\mu}_{\nu} by construction.
The set of W that satisfy this Wk=k are called the little group.
Correct so far? I guess my question is then what to make of this? To take an example off of Table 2.1 page 66 if my state vector is dependent on k-momentum (already in standard form), (0,0,0,M) (case (a)) then are the only transformations that leave it invariant (i.e. can produce an eigenvalue-eigenvector) those of SO(3), the rotation group?
As you can see I have lots of the pieces but just not quite sure what the whole point is, but really want to get it properly. Thanks
We have the Poincaré group of symmetries; we wish to know how to represent operators (derived from these symmetries) that act on physical states, \Psi, in the Hilbert space.
Since 4-momenta - p - commute as shown in the Lie Algebra of the group, classify the state-vectors according to p and someother quantities \sigma. Then use a Lorentz transformation to re-write a general momentum state \Psi_{p,\sigma} in terms of a finite number of distinct "standard momenta" k_{\mu}, as in equation (2.5.5). This standard momentum k_{\mu} is invariant under a certain group symmetry W^{\mu}_{\nu} by construction.
The set of W that satisfy this Wk=k are called the little group.
Correct so far? I guess my question is then what to make of this? To take an example off of Table 2.1 page 66 if my state vector is dependent on k-momentum (already in standard form), (0,0,0,M) (case (a)) then are the only transformations that leave it invariant (i.e. can produce an eigenvalue-eigenvector) those of SO(3), the rotation group?
As you can see I have lots of the pieces but just not quite sure what the whole point is, but really want to get it properly. Thanks
Last edited: