Weld Geometry Question: Understanding Dimensions and Terminology

  • Thread starter Thread starter minoroctave
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that a "1/2 by 2 in rectangular cross section" indicates the 1/2 dimension extends into the page, not as depicted in the diagram. The "shank of the attachment" refers to the metal piece with the 2"x1/2" cross section welded to another piece. The term "base area adjacent to the weld" is less clear but likely refers to the area of the gusset plate directly beneath the fillet welds. Additionally, it is suggested that drawing a free body diagram could help determine if force F causes shear in the welds. Understanding these terms is crucial for accurate interpretation of weld geometry and its implications.
minoroctave
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
In the question they say a "1/2 by 2 in rectangular cross section". Does this mean the dimension of 1/2 is actually into the page and not as shown in the diagram?

Also, In the solution there is mention of "the base metal adjacent to the weld" and "shank of the attachment". What areas are these referring to?

thanks
 

Attachments

  • weld.png
    weld.png
    9.4 KB · Views: 680
Engineering news on Phys.org
jedishrfu said:
Yes, that would be my interpretation.

does the force F cause shear in the welds?
 
minoroctave said:
does the force F cause shear in the welds?
You could draw a free body diagram and see.
 
SteamKing said:
You could draw a free body diagram and see.

thanks. do you also know what is meant by the "shank of the attachment" and the "base area adjacent to the weld"?
 
minoroctave said:
thanks. do you also know what is meant by the "shank of the attachment" and the "base area adjacent to the weld"?
The "shank of the attachment" is the piece of metal which has the 2"x1/2" cross section and is welded to the piece at left.

The "base area adjacent to the weld" is somewhat vague. It could mean the area of the gusset plate directly beneath the fillet welds.
 
  • Like
Likes minoroctave
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Back
Top