Well Defined Integrals: Proving and Evaluating with Domain Restrictions

  • Thread starter Thread starter jamesbob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
jamesbob
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Here iv to show that integrals are well defined and find their values:

a) I = \left\int_{0}{4} \frac{x - 1}{\sqrt{16 - x^2}}dx

this one i can show its well defined ok (the domain will be positive as x will be between 0 and 4) but can't find the value. So far my work goes:

I = \int_{0}^{4} ( \frac{x}{\sqrt{16 - x^2}} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{16 - x^2}}

I know the first part will be arcsin x/4 but i can't do the first part. I began doing substitution but wasn't sure:

u = 16 - x^2 \left \frac{du}{dx} = -2x \left So \left xdx = \frac{-du}{2} so the intergral is
\frac{-1}{2} \int_{u = 16}^{u = 0} \frac{du}{\sqrt{16 - u^2}}
I don't feel this is right. especially the limits i got, theyr impossible right? To get them i said:
u = 16 - x^2 \left So \left u = 16 - (0)^2 = 16 \left and \ u = 16 - 4^2 = 0

b) \int_{0}^{1} (lnx + 2)
This one i can do but can't say why its well defined. Is it because the value of lnx will be 0 but the addition of 2 will keep keep it non-zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jamesbob said:
Here iv to show that integrals are well defined and find their values:

a) I = \left\int_{0}{4} \frac{x - 1}{\sqrt{16 - x^2}}dx

this one i can show its well defined ok (the domain will be positive as x will be between 0 and 4) but can't find the value. So far my work goes:

I = \int_{0}^{4} ( \frac{x}{\sqrt{16 - x^2}} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{16 - x^2}}

I know the first part will be arcsin x/4 but i can't do the first part. I began doing substitution but wasn't sure:

u = 16 - x^2 \left \frac{du}{dx} = -2x \left So \left xdx = \frac{-du}{2} so the intergral is
\frac{-1}{2} \int_{u = 16}^{u = 0} \frac{du}{\sqrt{16 - u^2}}
I don't feel this is right. especially the limits i got, theyr impossible right? To get them i said:
u = 16 - x^2 \left So \left u = 16 - (0)^2 = 16 \left and \ u = 16 - 4^2 = 0

b) \int_{0}^{1} (lnx + 2)
This one i can do but can't say why its well defined. Is it because the value of lnx will be 0 but the addition of 2 will keep keep it non-zero?


Try this substitution: x = 4sin\theta for both integrals of part (a).

-LD
 
If u= 16- x2, then
\sqrt{16-x^2}
is NOT
\sqrt{16- u^2}
!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top