Courses What Advanced Math Courses Should a Tutor Pursue to Enhance Teaching Skills?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ccb138
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Tutor
AI Thread Summary
A private math tutor is considering pursuing a master's degree in mathematics education to enhance teaching skills and deepen understanding of mathematical concepts. The tutor has completed coursework up to second-semester college calculus and physics but feels overwhelmed by the advanced topics needed for a solid foundation beyond calculus. Key areas of interest include rings, groups, fields, metrics, continuity, vector spaces, and the relationship between real and complex number systems, among others. To achieve a comprehensive understanding, recommendations include taking courses in analysis, abstract algebra, and linear algebra, with prerequisites in proof techniques. Non-Euclidean geometry and complex variables typically require separate courses, and familiarity with analysis is advised before tackling complex variables. Physics courses will help apply these mathematical concepts to real-world systems. While most topics fit within standard curricula, basic non-Euclidean geometries may require self-study or specialized courses in differential geometry.
ccb138
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am a private math tutor for high school and college students who are struggling with their math courses. I'm considering pursuing a masters degree in mathematics education to both improve my teaching abilities and deepen my understanding of the mathematical and physical science concepts that I teach on a regular basis. The courses that I usually tutor in are Algebra, Geometry, Pre-Calculus and High School Calculus and Physics. My own mathematics and physics education has gone formally up to second semester college calculus and second semester college physics, and informally into various areas of mathematics but without formal grounding and expansion.

Having completed courses up to second semester college calculus, I'm a bit overwhelmed and lost in the various math courses that I could pursue in deepening my understanding of the subjects I teach, mostly because I don't know the order of progression that is needed to get a good grounding beyond the calculus level. I would like to come out of this process with a firm understanding of the following ideas and concepts, and I need to know which branches of mathematics and course names will usually cover this material:

Rings, Groups, Fields, Defining Metrics and Spaces, Deeper looks at Symmetries and Transformations and their connection to Operations and Sets ; Continuity, Completeness, and Closure, Vectors, Vector Spaces, Components, and Operations on Vectors, Sets, Constructing and Defining Sets, Operations on Sets, Deeper Understanding of the Relationship between the Real and Complex Number Systems, finding out why the Trigonometric Functions and Complex Numbers have a relationship, Basic Non-Euclidean Geometries and converting the Theorems of Euclidean Spaces to their N-E Counterparts, Functions of Real and Complex Variables, and the usage of the above concepts to explain and model physical systems such as Kinematics, Forces, and Fields.

I'd greatly appreciate the assistance of anyone who has an advanced understanding of mathematics at the college and graduate level who can help point me in the right direction. =) Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You can get an introduction to almost all of those things by taking courses in analysis, abstract algebra, and linear algebra.
 


Many thanks, Number Nine! =) When you say almost all, do you happen to know which ones won't fit in those courses that I would need to supplement from outside?
 


ccb138 said:
Many thanks, Number Nine! =) When you say almost all, do you happen to know which ones won't fit in those courses that I would need to supplement from outside?

Non-euclidian geometry and complex variables are usually courses in their own right. You'll want some basic familiarity in analysis before studying complex variables, which is, itself, usually a prerequisite for non-euclidean geometry.
 


I've listed all the topics in an order which should be natural. I added the prereqs and listed the topics it would teach you.

Intro to proofs
Sets, Constructing and Defining Sets, Operations on Sets,

Linear Algebra (be acquainted with proofs before this):
Vectors, Vector Spaces, Components, and Operations on Vectors

Abstract Algebra (be acquainted to proofs before this):
Rings, Groups, Fields, Deeper looks at Symmetries and Transformations and their connection to Operations and Sets

Real Analysis (be very acquainted with proofs and calculus before this):
Defining Metrics and Spaces, Continuity, Completeness, and Closure, Functions of Real and Complex Variables,

Complex Analysis (requires real analysis):
Deeper Understanding of the Relationship between the Real and Complex Number Systems, finding out why the Trigonometric Functions and Complex Numbers have a relationship, Functions of Real and Complex Variables

Physics (requires multivariable calculus):
the usage of the above concepts to explain and model physical systems such as Kinematics, Forces, and Fields.

The only thing which does not fit any category neatly is:
Basic Non-Euclidean Geometries and converting the Theorems of Euclidean Spaces to their N-E Counterparts

Perhaps you can do this in differential geometry, but that depends on the class. However, there are many books which cover this (for example "the four pillars of geometry" by Stillwell) if you're ok with self-studying
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top