What angle will make the resultant of three forces vertical? [with picture]

  • Thread starter Thread starter SUCRALOSE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Systems
AI Thread Summary
To determine the angle that makes the resultant of three forces vertical, the horizontal components of the forces must sum to zero. The calculations show that the sum of the horizontal components is -131 lb, while the vertical components total 66 lb, leading to a resultant of 147 lbs. By using the angles of 140° and 165°, the equation 70(cos140°) + 80(cos165°) + 150(cosθ) = 0 can be established to find the unknown angle. The discussion highlights the importance of balancing horizontal and vertical forces to achieve a vertical resultant. This problem-solving approach has clarified the concept for participants.
SUCRALOSE
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
I have tried everything on this one that I can think of.

I understand that the forces in the horizontal are 0, but I don't know where to start.

says: determine the angle for which the resultant of the three forces is vertical. See Picture.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please see this picture for above question.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    3.9 KB · Views: 422
SUCRALOSE said:
I have tried everything on this one that I can think of.

I understand that the forces in the horizontal are 0, but I don't know where to start.

says: determine the angle for which the resultant of the three forces is vertical. See Picture.

What is the sum of the horizontal components of the two, fully defined forces?
 
The sum of the horizontal components, in the x direction, is:

70(cos140) + 80(cos165) = -131lb

to take it further;

70(sin140) + 80(sin165) = 66lb

r= (-131)2 + (66)2 = 147 lbs

inverse tan = 66/-131 = -27 degrees(I think I get it now) the resultant is vertical up.. so the sum of the left side is the same as right side...
 
Last edited:
SUCRALOSE said:
The sum of the horizontal components, in the x direction, is:

70(cos140) + 80(cos165) = -131lb

to take it further;

70(sin140) + 80(sin165) = 66lb

r= (-131)2 + (66)2 = 147 lbs

inverse tan = 66/-131 = -27 degrees


(I think I get it now) the resultant is vertical up.. so the sum of the left side is the same as right side...

Exactly, and with your creative use of 140o and 165o angles, you could simply have said

70(cos140o) + 80(cos165o) + 150(cosθ) = 0
 
Thanks lots Peter,

At first I was trying to rearrange " 70(cos140o) + 80(cos165o) + 150(cosθ) = 0" for the unknown angle and was frustrated as to why that wouldn't work.

tricky trick question.

Thanks, now I can sleep, lol.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top