What are Calabi-Yau Manifolds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manifolds
AI Thread Summary
Calabi-Yau manifolds are complex manifolds characterized by n-tuples of complex numbers and are defined as Kaehler manifolds, which possess compatible Riemannian metrics and Hermitian forms. They also meet the topological requirement of having a vanishing first Chern class, indicating smoothness. Calabi conjectured that such manifolds would exhibit vanishing Ricci curvature, implying local flatness, a theory later proven by Yau. This proof led to the construction of Calabi-Yau manifolds widely used in string theory. For those interested in learning more, "Geometry, Topology, and Physics" by M. Nakahara is recommended as a self-contained introduction.
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
what are they?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
They are manifolds, with coordinates of each point being n-tuples. Each coordinate in these n-tuple is a complex number, like x+iy. In addition to this they meet two other conditions:

1) They are Kaehler manifolds. As manifolds they have a Riemannian metric, and as complex spaces they have a Hermitian form, and in Kaehler manifolds these two conditions are compatible. I can't get any more specific than that without giving a course in Kaehler manifolds.

2) They satisfy a topological constraint called the vanishing of the first Chern class. This means that they are pretty smooth.

Calabi conjectured that in manifolds like this the Ricci curvature (from Riemannian geometry) would vanish. They would be "locally flat" in a technical sense.

Yau proved Calabi's conjecture and constructed the family of Calabi-Yau manifolds that string theorists use today.
 
Where to begin to learn such things?
Can you recommend some self contained books about subject.
 
I find Geometry, Topology, and Physics, by M. Nakahara to be an excellent introduction to these topics. It assumes an undergraduate familiarity with set theory, calculus, complex analysis, and linear algebra, but given that it is reasonably self-contained.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top