What Are Dimensions and How Do They Impact Our Understanding of Reality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter [ infinite ]
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of dimensions, particularly beyond the fourth dimension, and how they are defined and utilized in scientific contexts. A dimension is described as the number of labels needed to identify an object, with examples given for one, two, and three dimensions, as well as complex scenarios like thermodynamics requiring higher-dimensional spaces. The conversation also touches on the nature of time in physics, questioning how time can be universally identified when it is relative for different particles. The idea of establishing a zero-point, such as the beginning of the universe, is proposed as a way to define time dimensionally. Overall, the thread explores the complexities of dimensionality and its implications in scientific thought.
[ infinite ]
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello all-

This is something that has been on my mind ever since I first learned about the fourth dimension and beyond, sometime back in fifth grade. This is simply one of those things that I never really 'got'.

What is a dimension? How does an n-th dimension (where n>3) exist? What exactly are the n-th dimensions (where n>3)? What is the evidence for their existence? How are dimensions relevant to scientific thought?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A "dimension" is the number of "labels" (normally numbers but can be other things) necessary to identify something of interest.

If I am working with points on a given line or curve, I could choose any point on the line as a starting point and identify all other points by their distance (positive in one direction, negative in the other) from that point. I can identify each point by a single number- one dimension.

If I am working with points in the plane, surface of a sphere, or some other surface, I can set up a Cartesian coordinate system, or polar coordinates and, either way, identify each point by two numbers-two dimensional.

If I am working with points "in space", I will need three numbers- space is three dimensional.

If I am doing research on spheres, I might label each sphere by its center (I will need 3 numbers to label the center point) and its radius (one more number). That's a "four dimensional" problem.

Going to physics, the basic thing physicists work with is an "event"- something that happens at a specific point at a specific time. Identifying an event requires the 3 numbers to identify the point and one number to identify the time- four numbers, four dimensions. That's why physicists say they work in a "four dimensional space-time continuum".

On the other hand, if I am working on thermodynamics, with a gas of, say N molecules, I might wish to identify the position (3 numbers) and the momentum vector (another 3 numbers) of each molecule as well as the time. I would be working in "6N+1" dimensional space.
 
Originally posted by [ infinite ]
Hello all-

This is something that has been on my mind ever since I first learned about the fourth dimension and beyond, sometime back in fifth grade. This is simply one of those things that I never really 'got'.

What is a dimension? How does an n-th dimension (where n>3) exist? What exactly are the n-th dimensions (where n>3)? What is the evidence for their existence? How are dimensions relevant to scientific thought?

I wanted to address this question once and for all some time back so I created this web page. See
http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/ma/coord_system.htm
 
Thanks for the reply, it was really comprehensive and made things much more lucid. Also thanks for the site pmb_phy.

Reading HallsofIvy's reply gave rise to yet another question.

Originally posted by HallsofIvy
Going to physics, the basic thing physicists work with is an "event"- something that happens at a specific point at a specific time. Identifying an event requires the 3 numbers to identify the point and one number to identify the time- four numbers, four dimensions.

...I understand the 'mattress' analogy of space-time, and how it can be curved. However, can a specific time be 'identified'? Isn't time individual for all particles? How can "one number... identify the time"?
 
Originally posted by [ infinite ]
Thanks for the reply, it was really comprehensive and made things much more lucid. Also thanks for the site pmb_phy.

Reading HallsofIvy's reply gave rise to yet another question.



...I understand the 'mattress' analogy of space-time, and how it can be curved. However, can a specific time be 'identified'? Isn't time individual for all particles? How can "one number... identify the time"?

It can't, all things are relative. The dimension is used as a way to assign a value to something inherintly infinite. There is no 'one number' to define our position in any dimension unless a zero-point is designated. For example, if I asked you where we were in the X-axis of space, what would you say? Well, assuming you knew the orientation of the X-axis, you would ask where the zero-point is and reply with your distance from that point. To answer your question more specifically, if you define the zero-point of time as the beginning of the universe, we are at approximately 14.5 billion years in the "time" dimension.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top