MATLAB What are Matlabs,Mathcad,Mathmatica,Maple?

  • Thread starter Thread starter I_am_learning
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maple Mathcad
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on comparing four software options for engineering analysis and visualization: Mathematica, Maple, Matlab, and Mathcad. Mathematica is highlighted as the best choice for symbolic work, offering powerful programming capabilities, though it has a steep learning curve and is slower for numerical tasks. Maple is considered easier to learn and suitable for occasional users tackling simpler problems, but it lacks the power of Mathematica. Matlab is noted for its user-friendliness and extensive toolboxes, making it popular in industry for numerical data processing, despite being less efficient than lower-level programming languages. A symbolic package exists in Matlab, but it is not as robust as those in Mathematica or Maple. Mathcad is mentioned but not discussed in detail. Overall, the choice depends on the user's specific needs in symbolic versus numerical analysis and their intended application in industry or research.
I_am_learning
Messages
681
Reaction score
16
They all look the same:rolleyes:. Could Somebody point out the differences and tell me which is the best for engineering Analysis and Visualization.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems like question posted in wrong sub-forum.
 
Matlab.
 
Mathematica: Probably the best choice for symbolic work. A little slower at numerical work. Fairly steep learning curve, but once you learn it well, you can write very powerful programs very quickly. Worth learning if you intend to do high level math or theoretical physics.

Maple: Not as powerful as Mathematica, easier to learn, good for occasional users solving (relatively) simple symbolic and/or numeric problems. Worth using if you want something to help you with your homework, but not do too much beyond that.

Matlab: Easier to use than Mathematica, not as easy as Maple. Many toolboxes available for many different tasks, interfaces well with lots of other software. More commonly used than Mathematica or Maple in industry and many research disciplines. It is popular because you can quickly write programs to process large amounts of data. While the programs won't be as efficient as ones written in lower level languages (C++ for example), the time saved in writing them often makes up for this. There is a symbolic package for doing simple symbolic work, but it's nowhere near as powerful as Mathematica or even Maple. Worth learning if you intend to do a lot of numerical data processing work, or work in industry.

Mathcad: Never used it, sorry.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top