What are my units when finding % diff. In kinetic energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the percent difference in kinetic energy before and after a collision involving Phrank, Phrancine, and a skateboard. The kinetic energy before the collision is 88.1 J, while after it is 51.88 J, leading to a percent difference of 51.75%. Participants clarify that percent difference is a dimensionless quantity, despite being expressed as a percentage. The conversation highlights the confusion around the concept of units in percentage calculations, emphasizing that while ratios are dimensionless, percentages are commonly used for clarity. Understanding the nature of percentages as a representation of ratios is key to resolving the confusion.
astru025
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
What are my units when finding % diff. In kinetic energy?

Homework Statement



Phrank (36.4kg) runs at 2.2 m/s and jumps onto a large stationary skateboard (2.3kg) on which Phrancine (22.7kg) is sitting. After the collision, Phrank, Phrancine, and the skateboard move at 1.3 m/s. Find the kinetic energy before and after the collision along with the percent difference.


Homework Equations



Kinetic energy before equals= 88.1 J
Kinetic energy after= 51.88 J
Percent difference= 88.1-51.88 / (88.1 + 51.88/2 ) x 100 = 51.75 WHAT ARE MY UNITS HERE?

The Attempt at a Solution


Need help with my units for percent difference! J is no correct!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Percent difference is a unit-less number.
 
More precisely, it is a dimensionless number.
 
And not percent? I can be horribly wrong, but I was always under impression that if it goes like

\frac{3J}{2J}100\% = 150\%

ratio is dimensionless but the answer is in %.

Not that % is a physical unit. Actually now that I think about it, I have no idea what % is.
 
Borek said:
ratio is dimensionless but the answer is in %.

Not that % is a physical unit. Actually now that I think about it, I have no idea what % is.
You could certainly argue that dimensionless quantities nevertheless have units - whole numbers, percentages, millions... But if I ask how many km/h a certain speed limit is the answer could be 50 - it would not, strictly speaking, be 50km/h. In the same way, if asked what percentage 3 is of 4 then the answer is 75, not 75% (which could legitimately be interpreted as 75/100 or 0.75). Does that make sense?
 
haruspex said:
Does that make sense?

More or less... not your fault, I am slow today :zzz:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top