What Are Some Alternative Fixed Temperature Baths for Accurate Calibration Data?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Temperature
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding safe and effective methods to create temperature baths for precise calibration of thermistors within the -20 to 105 C range, aiming for accuracies below 0.1 C, ideally down to 0.01 C. The primary suggestion involves using Gallium, which has a melting point of 29.7646 C and a heat of fusion of 5.59 kJ·mol−1, allowing for stable temperature maintenance. Participants express a preference for avoiding highly reactive materials like Sodium, Phosphorus, and Potassium. Additionally, organic solids with known melting points are suggested as potential alternatives, with references to resources like the CRC Handbook for further exploration of melting points and standards. The conversation emphasizes the importance of material purity and the availability of standards for accurate temperature calibration.
Physt
Messages
48
Reaction score
1
I'm familiar with cooling baths to attain exact temperatures at intervals starting around 13 C and going down from there, but does anyone know of a list of baths that are reasonably safe and effective to attain exact temperatures in a higher range? So far my best idea would be to use liquid and solid parts of Gallium roughly centered around it's 29.7646 C melting point (each part starting ~3-4 degrees off that center point) since it has a heat of fusion of 5.59 kJ·mol−1 it should provide for an accurate fixed temperature bath for a decent amount of time. Does anyone know of some others (with readily obtained materials)? I'd prefer to avoid things like Sodium, Phosphorus and Potassium since they are so reactive.

The purpose of this would be to get calibration data on some individual off the shelf thermistors in the -20 - 105 C range and hit accuracies below 0.1 C (preferably down to the 0.01 C range) as opposed to the typical off the shelf tolerances of 1%.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Depends on the expense you are allowed and the accuracy required. I made a half-dozen custom temperature compensating diodes, for nuclear reactor neutron power indication, that my metrologists calibrated in a water bath.
 
Physt said:
I'm familiar with cooling baths to attain exact temperatures at intervals starting around 13 C and going down from there, but does anyone know of a list of baths that are reasonably safe and effective to attain exact temperatures in a higher range? So far my best idea would be to use liquid and solid parts of Gallium roughly centered around it's 29.7646 C melting point (each part starting ~3-4 degrees off that center point) since it has a heat of fusion of 5.59 kJ·mol−1 it should provide for an accurate fixed temperature bath for a decent amount of time. Does anyone know of some others (with readily obtained materials)? I'd prefer to avoid things like Sodium, Phosphorus and Potassium since they are so reactive.

The purpose of this would be to get calibration data on some individual off the shelf thermistors in the -20 - 105 C range and hit accuracies below 0.1 C (preferably down to the 0.01 C range) as opposed to the typical off the shelf tolerances of 1%.

Organic solids might have melting points useful to you. The CRC handbook will list melting points of organic solids. Purity is always an issue, with these though. You are in the range where there are a lot of standards.

e.g. http://www.thinksrs.com/downloads/PDFs/ApplicationNotes/MP_Protocols.pdf
http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/analytical-chromatography/analytical-products.html?TablePage=9639990
http://www.al-labor.at/cms/images/stories/docs/Melting%20Point%20%20Standards.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top