What Are Some Do-Able Phytoplankton Experiment Topics?

AI Thread Summary
Phytoplankton experiments can focus on various factors affecting their primary productivity, such as temperature and light intensity, though challenges arise in measuring these effects accurately due to overlapping variables. One proposed method involves measuring dissolved oxygen to assess productivity, but temperature influences this measurement, complicating the experiment. The discussion also raises the issue of how to ensure equal amounts of phytoplankton are distributed in containers for consistent results. Techniques for pipetting phytoplankton without damaging them are questioned, highlighting the need for careful handling. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of designing experiments that can effectively isolate and measure specific variables affecting phytoplankton growth.
Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1
I need to do an experiment involving phytoplankton, and I'm having trouble finding do-able topics: I'm not a researcher with access to very expensive equipment. I do, however, have access to whatever is at my school.

So far, I've come up with testing the effect of temperature on phytoplankton primary productivity, but the way I'm going to be measuring primary productivity is through the amount of dissolved oxygen in the water, but the amount of dissolved oxygen is similarly affected by the temperature! So that clearly isn't going to work :)!

I've also thought about doing light intensity on primary productivity, but we just did an experiment involving light intensity and primary productivity ... so that's probably not good.

And one more question to all the biology experts out there: how exactly does one go about putting equal amounts of phytoplankton inside containers? I know how to catch phytoplankton, but how do you put an equal amount of phytoplankton inside jars?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Qube said:
I need to do an experiment involving phytoplankton, and I'm having trouble finding do-able topics: I'm not a researcher with access to very expensive equipment. I do, however, have access to whatever is at my school.

So far, I've come up with testing the effect of temperature on phytoplankton primary productivity, but the way I'm going to be measuring primary productivity is through the amount of dissolved oxygen in the water, but the amount of dissolved oxygen is similarly affected by the temperature! So that clearly isn't going to work :)!

Gee, if only we had a control at the same temperature to compare...

And one more question to all the biology experts out there: how exactly does one go about putting equal amounts of phytoplankton inside containers? I know how to catch phytoplankton, but how do you put an equal amount of phytoplankton inside jars?
How small are these little buggers? Can you pipette a stirred solution of them without squishing 'em?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top