What Are Some Free Alternatives to GraphCalc for Advanced Graph Plotting?

neutrino
Messages
2,091
Reaction score
2
Hi,
I downloaded a program called GraphCalc(www.graphcalc.com) a couple of days back, and I have been having fun putting in functions and generating surfaces. Could someone recommend other such softwares(freewares) that are as good or better than the above mentioned. It need not strictly be a graphing program, but I would like to have one a little more functional. I've gone thro' the web, but the lists are quite long and most of them end up being trialwares. So, I thought of asking the experts around for advice.

'A freeware with a lot of features'...I realize that I'm asking too much, but it's a possibility.


Thanks,
Navneeth
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Did you try gnuplot?
Its free and one of the best programs out there.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top