What Are the Algebraic Mysteries in Energy-Momentum-Mass Relations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bazinga101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Relations
Bazinga101
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
<<Mentor note: Please always use descriptive thread titles.>>

First of all, the title is such that it attracts most views.You see, in class our professor did some goofing around numbers and variables in the relativistic energy momentum relation:
E2=(pc)2+m02c4
Since the energy required to accelerate an object to a certain velocity is
E=m0c2/√1-v2/c2,
∴E2=m02c4/1-v2/c2
plug in the value of E2,
p2c2+m02c4=m02c4/1-v2/c2
cancel out the m02c4
so p2c2=1/1-v2/c2
since c2= E/m,
⇒Ep2/m=1/1-v2/c2\
But, p2/m = 2* K.E and since E in E=mc2 implies any form of energy,and the object gains kinetic energy through it's motion, so Ek=E
⇒E(2E)=1/1-v2/c2
⇒2E2=1/1-v2/c2
⇒E2=1/2(1-v2/c2)
⇒E2=1/2-v2/c2
⇒E=1/√2-v2/c2
and that's it.No one in the room could figure out what's wrong, but our prof. said that something is wrong, but it is our job to find it out, plus, immediately one notices that if v=c, E=1 J. WTH!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This might actually be readable if you put in some parentheses.
 
Bazinga101 said:
p2c2+m02c4=m02c4/1-v2/c2
cancel out the m02c4
so p2c2=1/1-v2/c2
That's... an interesting piece of algebra you did there.
 
Bandersnatch said:
That's... an interesting piece of algebra you did there.
Thanks Bandersnatch, i finally find out the mistake he did, and sorry for sounding stupid
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top