What are the Boundary Conditions for Dielectric Interfaces?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the boundary conditions for the electric displacement field (D) at the interface between two infinite dielectrics with a constant free charge density. It is established that the difference in D fields across the boundary equals the free surface charge density (s), leading to the conclusion that D should be the same on both sides, resulting in D = s/2. Clarification is sought on how to prove that D remains constant across the boundary despite differing permittivities (epsilon) of the materials. The relationship between D and the electric field (E) is highlighted, noting that while D is uniform, E varies due to the differing permittivities of air and the dielectric. The discussion concludes with an affirmation that D's consistency across the boundary arises from its definition and Gauss's Law for materials.
plmokn2
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Say I have a boundary between two dielectrics then it's easy to show using a gaussian pillarbox that:
D(1)-D(2)=free surface charge density=s
where D(1) is the component of the first medium normal to the surface.
But suppose that there's nothing else apart from two infinite dielectrics with a constant free charge density between then, how would I work out what the actual values of D(1) and D(2) are rather than just the difference?

The Attempt at a Solution


It seems reasonable that the D field should be the same on both sides so that D=s/2 but I'm not sure how I'd prove this?

Any help appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm having a hard time interpreting what you are asking. Could you draw it?
 
I think my question was badly worded/ I've probably misused some terminology.

I suppose my actual qustion is:
Its obvious from the symmetry that for an uncharged nonconducting non-dielectric that if you put a surface charge density s on it the field above is the same magnitude as the field below: D=s/2.

But suppose that the material is a dielectric then I'm not sure how you prove what the D field is above the surface (in air) and below the surface (in the dielectric) (under the same condition of the dielectric being infinite with surface charge s and no other free charge anywhere)

Hope this is a bit clearer, please say if it isn't.
 
Oh, well D is going to be the same for both air and the dielectric, but E will be different because E is D/(epsilon) which will change between the two (epsilon_0 for air and dielectric epsilon in the dielectric). Is this what you are asking about?
 
That's it.

Its probably really obvious but how do you know that D has to be the same on both sides of the boundary?
Thanks
 
It comes from the way D is defined. After its whole redefinition then you just get a Gauss's Law for materials which goes as

\iint \mathbf{D} \cdot d\mathbf{a} = \sigma_f

and that means that the only thing that you care about is the free charge, which will be the same on both sides.
 
Thanks.
 
Back
Top