What are the challenges in calculating the Bohr radius?

robertjford80
Messages
388
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



the equation for the bohr radius is

4pi (permitivity of free space) * (reduced Planck constant)/
(elementrary charge)2(mass of an electron)




The Attempt at a Solution




let's just just focus on orders of magnitude:

(10^-12 * 10^-34)/(((10^-19)^2)*(10^-31)

That's 10^-46/10^-69 which works out to about 10^13 way off of the 10^-11
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are a few problems here:

1. It's supposed to be the reduced Planck constant squared. This makes a huge difference.

2. When doing an order of magnitude estimate, you can't just completely ignore the numbers that multiply the powers of ten. You can imagine that their product can add on another couple of orders of magnitude. Instead, try rounding them to one sig fig. You also certainly can't ignore the factor of 4pi! That's like 13...another order of magnitude right there. So in the end, a better estimate would be something like this:

4*pi *(9e-12)(1e-34)^2/(2e-19)^2*(10e-31)

9e-12 is almost 1e-11, illustrating why it's perilous to ignore the coefficients.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top