What are the components of an applied force?

AI Thread Summary
Applied force is defined as a contact force exerted by a person, which can be broken down into components when acting at an angle. The perpendicular component to the surface is the normal force, while the parallel component relates to friction. However, in scenarios with no friction between the object and the surface, the applied force does not translate into motion. Instead, if a force is applied at an angle on a frictionless surface, it results in a purely normal force, preventing any horizontal movement. Understanding this distinction clarifies the relationship between intent and the actual outcome of the applied force.
Book reader
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Something said in my physics textbook really confused me.
The following was written : "Applied Force is our label for a contact force that a person exerts. When an applied force acts at an angle, it is actually a combination of two forces : normal and friction. The component of the applied force that is perpendicular to the surface is a normal force, and the component parallel to the surface is a friction force."

I always thought an applied force acting at an angle was made up of Fa[y] and Fa[x] for the vertical and horizontal components respectively. I questioned my teacher about this and he said that the forces of friction and normal are between the surface of the object and the hand, not between the object and the ground, however that didn't help much at all. Could anyone provide some clarification with regards to the statement above please? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider this example - pushing a book kept on a table, at an angle, say, ##θ## with the vertical. You are now pushing the book against the table, ##and## parallel to the table. For simplicity, let us assume that there exists no friction between the book and the table, and friction can exist beteen the book and the man, only.

Suppose the book moves horizontally. Which force is responsible for this?
How is this force generated? Do you get it now?
 
Your confusion comes from intent versus consequence.
Consider an extreme case of your thought experiment, a massless block jammed between two frictionless plates. The plates exert a normal force on the block. Now you intend to apply a force on the block parallel to the plates. But since there is no friction and the block is massless, there is no resistance. In consequence, you are simply not able to apply a force.
Now back to the original example. If you try to push down at an angle on a frictionless horizontal surface, you cannot actually apply such a force. The force you apply will be purely normal to the surface.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top