What are the conditions for a bench on an inclined plane to slide or tip?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the conditions required for a bench on an inclined plane to either slide or tip over. Key points include the need to analyze the forces acting on the bench, particularly the balance between gravitational forces and friction. The maximum slope before sliding is defined by the equation m*g*sin(B) < mg*cos(B)*u, while the tipping condition involves the relationship between the height (h) and distance (d) from the center of mass. Participants express concerns about missing critical aspects of the problem, particularly regarding rotational dynamics and the varying normal forces at the legs of the bench. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of determining when the bench will tip versus when it will slide, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of equilibrium conditions.
paalfis
Messages
69
Reaction score
2
http://file://localhost/Users/pablotano_94/Downloads/IMG_20141205_183228102.jpg 1. Homework Statement
Assume that the friction coefficient (both static and dynamic) is ¨u¨.
a) What is the maximum slope yo can get in order that the bench does not slide?
b) What is the maximum slope yo can get in order that the bench does not turn?
c) What condition must be satisfied, while you are increasing the slope, in order that the bench turns but does not slide?

The Attempt at a Solution


My results where:
a)m*g*sin(B)<mgcos(B)*u
b)tan(B)<d/(2h)
c) u*m*g*cos(arctan(d/(2h))>m*g*sin(B)

This problem is supposed to be a tough one.. But my solution was quite simple, so, I think I am missing something, I really need some help with this one..
Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20141205_183228102.jpg
    IMG_20141205_183228102.jpg
    50.1 KB · Views: 485
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't find the problem particularly tough, so I also suspect I'm missing something [:. But these were my thoughts related to your answers:

a) It's almost there, but if ##mg\sin(\beta) = mg\cos(\beta)u## I don't think the bench will slide.

b) and c) it's seems that you can solve them with one solution (that's the reason why I think I'm also missing something).

I assume the point at the top of the height h is the center mass. Think about the bench being on level ground and a person pushing in the upper left edge. There must be a force making it rotate around the lower right edge, and your equation for b) is not accounting for that. In what situation there will be equilibrium (there will be neither linear nor rotational net force)? What is causing the force (if there are any)? how is it related to the center of mass, h, and d?
 
I had the same though, anyway, the question asks for the condition necessary for the bench to TURN (hopefully meaning turning all the way down) not for the conditions necessary for the rotation to start. That would be a very complicated problem, because you would need the acceleration for the rotation in order to see what it is needed to reach for the "critical" point of turning all the way.
 
I think that the real problem comes when you consider that the normal force in each of the bench legs is different because of the angular momentum of the bench. Then, the front leg acts like a fulcrum and the rest of the bench turns with respect to it.
Sadly, I wasn't able to solve the problem this way..
 
paalfis said:
a)m*g*sin(B)<mgcos(B)*u
Right, but you can simplify that a lot. (Yes, it probably should include equality, but that's of no practical interest.)
paalfis said:
c) u*m*g*cos(arctan(d/(2h))>m*g*sin(B)
I think it's looking for a condition that does not depend on beta. The slope will be gradually increased until it either slides or tips.
paalfis said:
not for the conditions necessary for the rotation to start
No, it's only concerned with rotation starting. Once it starts it will continue until the bench has turned 90 degrees at least. You cannot tell what will happen after that since you do not know the full height of the bench.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top