What are the Confusing Aspects of Jackson Eq. 5.33 (3rd Ed.)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shehry1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jackson
shehry1
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I can't seem to figure out how he writes down this equation. Specifically:
a. Isn't Theta' = 90 degrees. Then why doesn't he write it out explicitly.
b. Whats the use of adding the Sin(Theta') if he is going to use a delta function using the Cos
c. What is the radius 'a' doing there. If the wire has no thickness, shouldn't the magnitude of J equal I.
d. Shouldn't J=I/Area^2 in terms of units.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
shehry1 said:

Homework Statement


I can't seem to figure out how he writes down this equation. Specifically:
a. Isn't Theta' = 90 degrees. Then why doesn't he write it out explicitly.

Because it's more convenient to write the measure as

\delta(\cos \theta') d(\cos \theta')

rather than

\sin \theta' \delta(\theta') d\theta'

It saves a lot of time, trust me.

b. Whats the use of adding the Sin(Theta') if he is going to use a delta function using the Cos

The current loop is in the x-y plane, where

\sin \theta' = 1

which is the same as

\cos \theta' = 0

I suppose he could have technically left out the sin(theta) and just put in 1 (just as he puts in 1/a instead of 1/r). However, perhaps he put it in so that the formula would be easier to generalize.

c. What is the radius 'a' doing there. If the wire has no thickness, shouldn't the magnitude of J equal I.

No. The integral of J over its cross-sectional area should equal I. That is:

I = \iint_R r \; dr \; d(\cos \theta) \; I \delta(\cos \theta) \frac{\delta(r-a)}{a}

where R is some vertical region that cuts across part of the wire. So you see, the 1/a is essential to give the correct value of I.

d. Shouldn't J=I/Area^2 in terms of units.

Yes, and it is. Or rather, J = I/Area. Remember that delta functions carry reciprocal units. So you get 1/L from the factor of 1/a, and another 1/L from the factor of \delta(r' - a).
 
Thanks a lot :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top