What are the differences between the two package types for MIC29302?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bitfoic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion
AI Thread Summary
The MIC29302 series features multiple package types, primarily differing in pin configuration for mounting methods. One package style has straight pins for surface mounting, while another has bent pins for through-hole mounting. The part number suffix indicates the specific package type, and the full datasheet provides essential details on thermal and electrical specifications. It's crucial to consult the complete datasheet to understand the variations and ensure the correct part is ordered. The differences in pin design and package types can lead to confusion, so thorough research is recommended.
bitfoic
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Hi, everyone! I am new here with my confusion. I search a part MIC29302 as I was looking for its datasheet. I know MIC29302 is a series. I check the part information on the website called [Spam reference redacted by the Mentors] and its official manufacturer microchip. I found that there are two images of this part on both two websites. The five pins in one of the images are bent and another is straight. What is the difference between the two types of pins? Is the difference only in the package? I am not sure whether I am right. Who can solve my confusion?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
With the same basic part number, the function of the two chips would be the same.

If you look at the last few pages of the data sheet(s) you will probably find that the final few characters of the part number (actually ordering number) differ between the two. That way you can order the pin shape you need for your particular assembly.

Since you did not give a link to the parts in question, I did not look them up specifically.

From your brief description I am assuming that one of the styles is for "thru hole" mounting on a circuit bouard where holes are drilled thru the board so that the pins are inserted into the holes and then soldered.

The other style would be where the pins are bent outward, away from the package, so they can be placed on the surface of a circuit board and then soldered, "surface mount".

Hope this helps.

Cheers,
Tom
 
If you found only two packages, then you missed some. According to the full series datasheet, it's three SMD and three TH types, with three (fixed voltage) or five (adjustable) pins.
The part number composition for the series is even more of a mess.

It's a bother, but always dig till you find the complete datasheet, and then try to link up the part numbers, functions and package info according to that and that only.
 
To add to the confusion for exactly the same silicon it is possible some chips will have pins bent "inward" (under the chip itself) and some will have no legs at all, just contacts on the belly. Plenty of different packages.

But the devil is in the details, there is no standard way of naming such chips and actually there is no way to be sure what you have/need - even full datasheet from the manufacturer can be sometimes misleading.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
bitfoic said:
The five pins in one of the images are bent and another is straight. What is the difference between the two types of pins? Is the difference only in the package? I am not sure whether I am right. Who can solve my confusion?
The different packages are usually specified in the part number suffix.

Where the thermal or electrical specifications differ for different package types, there will be multiple columns for the specification data.

The last few pages of a datasheet usually give the physical dimensions of the different packages available.

The manufacturer's datasheet is worth reading.
https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads...urrent-Low-Dropout-Regulators-DS20005685B.pdf
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top