What are the different types of intermolecular bonds and how do they differ?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion outlines various types of intermolecular bonds, starting with ionic bonds, exemplified by NaCl, as the strongest. Hydrogen bonds, which occur between hydrogen and electronegative atoms like nitrogen, oxygen, or fluorine, follow in strength. Dipole-dipole interactions are mentioned, though there is uncertainty about identifying them in substances. Additionally, dipole-induced dipole and induced dipole-induced dipole interactions are noted, with participants expressing confusion about their recognition in different substances. The conversation raises a question regarding the distinction between dipole-dipole interactions and hydrogen bonding.
transgalactic
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
0
i know that the strongest bond
is between metal and non-metal
like NaCl
after it comes the hidrogen bonds
which H bonds with N or O or F

after that comes the dipole- dipole bond
i don't know how to recognise it regarding what substances and how they look

after that comes dipole- induced dipole
i don't know how to recognise it regarding what substances and how they look

after that comes induces dipole- induced dipole
i don't know how to recognise it regarding what substances and how they look

??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
isnt dipole-dipole just another name for hydrogen bonding?
 
anyone??
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Dipole moment carbon florides of isotopes of Hydrogen
Replies
7
Views
3K
Chemistry How to understand hybridization in ##CH_3NNN##?
Replies
4
Views
3K
I Instantaneous dipole moment and orbitals
Replies
1
Views
83
I Covalent Bonds -- Which type of force?
Replies
8
Views
3K
Chemistry What Intermolecular Forces Operate in H₂O and CH₃OH Liquids?
Replies
9
Views
4K
Chemistry Intermolecular Forces: Dipole-Dipole, London Dispersion, H Bonding
Replies
6
Views
14K
Chemistry 6 Types of Intermolecular Forces Explained
Replies
2
Views
3K
I Question regarding how to interpret dipole moment for bound charges
Replies
1
Views
2K
Charge separation of O-H bond in water molecule?
Replies
12
Views
857
Chemistry Need Help with Bond Length Calculations of Acetylene
Replies
7
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top