What are the effects of different braking scenarios on cars and occupants?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Keith Warron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cars Studies
AI Thread Summary
Different braking scenarios significantly impact energy, momentum, and occupant safety in vehicles. Under normal braking conditions, a vehicle traveling at 30 m/s stops over 100 meters, resulting in a gradual decrease in kinetic energy and momentum. In a collision with ineffective crumple zones, the vehicle stops in 0.2 seconds, leading to a rapid change in velocity and higher forces acting on occupants. Conversely, effective crumple zones allow for a longer stopping time of 0.8 seconds, reducing the force experienced by occupants. The differences in kinetic energy, momentum, force, distance, and time highlight the importance of vehicle design in enhancing safety during collisions.
Keith Warron
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
For each part of this question, consider a vehicle that is traveling at a speed of 30m/s and then stops as described.
a) The vehicle stops under normal braking conditions over 100 metres.
b) The vehicle stops due to a collision when there are ineffective crumple zones (e.g. the vehicle is a 4WD with a rigid chassis and bulbar). Collision time = 0.2 seconds.
c) The vehicles stop due to a front-on collision when there are effectgive crumple zones on the vehicle. Collision time = 0.8 seconds.

For each of the situations above:
i) Describe the changes to energy and momentum that occur as the car stops.
ii) Calculate the force required to stop an 80kg person in the car.
iii) Calculate the distance and time taken to stop.
iv) Discuss the differences between the magnitudes of kinetic energy, momentum, force, distance and time in the three different situations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As i have already been told a lot not to give direct answers..you must be content with hints.:

1)change in k.e. and (mv2-mv1)
2)Force= mass * acceleration
3)Collision changes its velocity.
 
I'm not very clear on your hints I'm afraid mate.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top