What are the frequency bounds of waves from sine wave additive synthesis?

AI Thread Summary
When using additive synthesis with waves in the frequency range of 100-200 Hz, the resulting frequencies will remain within that same range. Adding waves of the same frequency does not create new frequencies; instead, it preserves the original frequencies. The Fourier transform is key to understanding this, as it shows that the addition of functions results in the sum of their Fourier transforms, maintaining the original frequency components. Therefore, it is not possible to generate frequencies like 400 Hz or 25 Hz from the given range through this method. The lowest frequency in the sum determines the overall frequency of the resulting wave.
hotwheelharry
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello,

If I can make any number of waves (n) all with the same phase but all within a frequency range of 100-200hz, what are the ranges of frequencies I can make when adding them?

So would I be able to make a wave with frequency 400hz, or 25hz, using additive synthesis and these constraints? Then, if so, how do I calculate what the exact range I could make is?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Old frequencies do not beget new frequencies.

When you add waves of a given frequency, you only get waves of the same frequency. It's like adding complex numbers. It's just the phase factor that counts.

How do you make sense of frequency? Fourier transform. Fourier transform is linear. So, if you add two functions, you add the Fourier transforms to see what happens in the frequency domain. If some frequency component is zero for two functions, then it will be zero for their sum. Addition doesn't give you any new frequencies.

So if you start with a frequency range of 100-200hz, by adding things, you stay within 100-200hz.
 
Oh, you made it clear with the Fourier transform sections being 0. I knew you could make a square wave with infinity frequencies added but I guess the frequency of that saw is just the lowest frequency added in the sum. Thanks for the response.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top