What are the Kinematics of a Car Plunging off the Grand Canyon Edge?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the kinematics of a car falling off the Grand Canyon, specifically addressing the time to impact and the vertical impact velocity. The car's initial vertical velocity is zero, and the acceleration due to gravity is -9.81 m/s². Participants clarify that the depth of the canyon is 500 m, and the first equation of motion can be used to solve for the time of fall. There is confusion regarding the final velocity being negative, but it is emphasized that the car is in free fall with no initial vertical velocity. The conversation concludes with a focus on applying the correct equations to find the time and final velocity accurately.
Below
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Thelma and Louise's car falls off the edge of the Grand Canyon and plunges to certain catastrophe below. The depth of the canyon at this point is 500 m. (Assume it drops off)

A) How long will it take the vehicle to impact the canyone bottom?

B) What will the vertical impact velocity be? Do you think they will survive, even with air bags?

Homework Equations



d = vit + 1/2at^2

d = (vi+vf)t
2

The Attempt at a Solution



d - 500m
ag = -9.81 m/s^2
vi = 0m/s
t =?

Since you can't solve for t, i solved for Vf.

Would the Vf be a negative number?

Then, i pluged the vi and vf into the 2nd equatioon above, but the answer i got was different from the answer given.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why can't you solve for t?
 
o wait, maybe i made a mistake.
 
I forgot that my Vi = 0 m/s therefore does not equate to a quadratic.
 
Well, use the first equation you wrote to solve for t. You know all the information you need to solve for part a.

The D = -500 m a = -g t=? and vi= 0 The reason why I say there is no initial velocity is because once the car goes over the edge and starts to fall, it's in free fall. The car may have HORIZONTAL velocity, but there is no initial vertical velocity.

Use that information and you can solve for v final.
 
Even if it's quadratic, why wouldn't you be able to solve for t?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
11K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
29
Views
6K
Back
Top