What Are the Limitations of Gauss's Law When Analyzing a Line Charge in Air?

AI Thread Summary
Gauss's Law is effective for infinite line charges because the electric field is uniform around the wire, but it fails for finite line charges due to the non-uniform electric field distribution. For a finite wire, the electric field varies depending on the observation point's location, as different segments of the wire contribute differently to the field. The discussion highlights that while Gauss's Law can be applied, it requires careful consideration of the electric field's behavior along the wire's length. The integration method is recommended to accurately calculate the electric field from each segment of a finite line charge. Understanding these limitations is crucial for correctly analyzing electric fields in various configurations.
TheRedDevil18
Messages
406
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A line charge exists in air along the z-axis between z=0 and z=5 cm. It has a uniform charge density given by:
ρl = 4(uC/m)
Determine E at (0,10 cm, 0)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I am using gauss law so I draw a cylinder around the wire

Qenc = ρl * L = ∫ D.ds , Gauss law

Qenc = ρl * L , where L is the length of the wire

ds = r*dθ*dz , where r is the distance from the wire to the point, 10 cm

ρl * L = D ∫ 0 to L ∫ 0 to 2pi r*dθ*dz

D = ρl/2pi*r = E*ε

E = ρl / 2pi*ε*r

= (4*10^-6)/(2pi*0.1*8.854*10^-12)
= 7.19*10^5
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gauss method works only if the electric field at any point on the enclosing surface is uniform, which is not in this problem because the wire is of finite length. Use the integration method to integrate the electric field from each line segment along the wire.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
Gauss method works only if the electric field at any point on the enclosing surface is uniform, which is not in this problem because the wire is of finite length. Use the integration method to integrate the electric field from each line segment along the wire.

I'm a bit confused. Why is the electric field uniform for an infinite wire and non uniform for a finite length wire ?
 
For the case of finite wire, imagine two points, one located near the left end of the wire, the other located at the center, both point lie on your cylindrical surface The electric field in the first point will tend to be directed to the left or right depending on the charge of the wire. For the point in the middle, it will feel the same amount of electric field from the left and right parts of the wire and hence will be directed perpendicularly to the wire.
For the case of infinite wire, no matter where you translate your observation point you will always end up in the same configuration as the wire has no end on both sides.
 
Another view: your Gaussian cylinder has flux coming out the sides in addition to the length. Gauss's theorem still holds but you can't ignore the side flux.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top