What are the most frequently cited physics textbooks?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the citation of physics textbooks within the literature, specifically focusing on the frequency of citations for textbooks in various subfields such as thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, classical mechanics, and electromagnetism. Participants explore the relevance and context of citing textbooks in research papers.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaning of "literature," suggesting that research papers typically do not cite textbooks.
  • Another participant argues that the material in physics textbooks is often considered "assumed knowledge" and not cited in research, as foundational concepts like Newton's laws or Maxwell's equations are generally known within the field.
  • A different viewpoint mentions that citations may occur for more controversial topics, such as String Theory or Loop Quantum Gravity, where textbooks might be referenced due to the less universally accepted nature of the material.
  • One participant shares personal experience, noting that specific textbooks have been cited infrequently in their field of volcanology, while also referencing a claim from Wikipedia about a particular thermodynamics textbook being highly cited.
  • Another participant provides an example of a specific textbook, Stratton's "Electromagnetic Theory," which has been cited thousands of times according to Google Scholar, suggesting that citations do exist and can be useful for justifying results.
  • This participant also raises a question about the significance of citations, emphasizing that the choice of a textbook should be based on its suitability for the intended purpose rather than its citation frequency.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the citation of textbooks in physics literature. While some believe textbooks are rarely cited due to their foundational nature, others provide examples of textbooks that have been cited, indicating a lack of consensus on the frequency and relevance of such citations.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the criteria for what constitutes "literature" and the contexts in which textbooks are cited. The discussion highlights the dependence on specific fields and the nature of the material being addressed.

Geremia
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
What are the most frequently cited __________ textbooks in the physics literature?

Where __________ is:

  • thermodynamics
  • quantum mechanics
  • classical mechanics
  • electromagnetism
  • etc.
?

I'm looking for lists based on citation statistics. Surely there are citations data out there on this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "literature"? Research papers don't cite textbooks, at least I don't remember ever seeing one that did.
 
The material contained in a physics textbook falls more under the realm of "assumed knowledge" as far as physics research goes. It's well established material. One isn't going to cite a physics textbook as a 'source' for using Newton's 2nd Law, Conservation of Energy, Maxwell's Equations, or the Schrödinger Equation. It's foundational to the field and doesn't need to be cited.

I could see citations being used from a textbook on a more controversial topic such as String Theory or Loop Quantum Gravity and such, where it may not be such common knowledge. But even still, the things contained in those textbooks are generally fundamental to the specific field being researched, and typically aren't being debated(within the scope of the field). A typical researcher would assume that the people who are reading their paper would know what was being referenced.
 
Hard to answer. When I was doing volcanology I saw Landau's text on fluids cited maybe twice. I recall seeing Boyd's text "Nonlinear Optics" cited once. Also, Wikipedia states that Callen's text "Thermodynamics and Introduction to Thermostatistics" is highly cited in literature.
 
Books are cited in literature. As an example, according to google scholar, Stratton's "Electromagnetic Theory" has been cited thousands of times:

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=12170316177373808744&as_sdt=40000005&sciodt=1,22&hl=en

some of those citations are from books, but many are from literature. You can get a notion of citations from google scholar, but better tools may exist.

Do such citations make sense? Sometimes yes, especially if it is to justify a result most people don't know off the top of their heads. Sometimes no.

A better questions is: what difference does it make? I would pick a book because it was suitable for the intended purpose, whether or not anyone ever cites it.

jason
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K