What Are the Natural Frequencies of a Double Pendulum Using Torque Methods?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the natural frequencies of a double pendulum system using torque methods. The user has attempted to derive equations based on torque and has encountered difficulties in obtaining the correct answers. Key equations involve the sum of torques equating to the moment of inertia times angular acceleration. A suggestion is made to draw free body diagrams (FBD) for both masses to derive accelerations in terms of the angles, highlighting the complexity due to the system's changing moment of inertia. The emphasis remains on solving the problem through torque analysis rather than alternative methods.
axe34
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


m = 1 kg, l = 1 m, theta 1 and 2 are small

I want to work out the natural frequencies (2) of this 2 DOF system through taking torques about the fixed point on the ceiling. I've done it using numerous fixed points and just cannot get the right answer.[/B]
upload_2016-4-16_13-56-58.png


Homework Equations


sum of torques = I . alpha

The Attempt at a Solution


Taking that cos theta = 1 and sin theta or tan theta = theta and acw moments are pos,

I get that for the lowest mass:
-mg (theta 2 + theta 1) + T2(theta1 + theta 2) - 2T2theta2 = 4alpha

for highest mass: -mgtheta1 - T2theta1 + theta2T2 = alpha.

Does anyone else get this? I want to solve it via torques and not any other method. NB: T2 = tension in lowest massless string.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
axe34 said:

Homework Statement


m = 1 kg, l = 1 m, theta 1 and 2 are small

I want to work out the natural frequencies (2) of this 2 DOF system through taking torques about the fixed point on the ceiling. I've done it using numerous fixed points and just cannot get the right answer.[/B]
View attachment 99206

Homework Equations


sum of torques = I . alpha
This equation is valid for a rigid body. Your system is not that, its parts move with relative to each other. The moment of inertia with respect the fixed point at the ceiling changes during the motion. Draw the FBD-s for both masses, and derive the accelerations in terms of the angles.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top