What are the orthogonal trajectories for x^2y=c_1 and x^2+c_{1}y^3=1?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the orthogonal trajectories for the equations x^2y=c_1 and x^2+c_{1}y^3=1. For part (a), the initial solution y=1/2 log{|x|} + C_2 is deemed incorrect, with the correct approach involving differentiating the equation to find the slope relationship for orthogonal curves. In part (b), the method to eliminate c_1 is discussed, emphasizing the need to differentiate after rewriting the equation. The conversation highlights the importance of showing work for better assistance and expresses some frustration over the lack of timely responses. Overall, the thread illustrates the collaborative nature of solving complex mathematical problems.
RadiationX
Messages
255
Reaction score
0
find the orthogonal trajectories of the following

(a) x^2y=c_1


(b) x^2+c_{1}y^3=1


for part (a) I've found y=\frac{1}{2}\log{|x|} + C_2


for part (b) if i solve this integral this should be the O.T.

\frac{3}{2}\int{(\frac{1}{x^2}-1)}dx= \frac{y^2}{2}

is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
this is very unusual that nobody has posted a response to this thread.
 
There was about three hours between your first and second posts! Do you think we have nothing better to do? (Especially on a Saturday- I spent yesterday hiking in the Shenandoah National Park!)

Your answer to part (a) is incorrect. We might be able to help you more if you showed how you got that.

Differentiating x2y= c1 with respect to x gives
2xy+ x2y'= 0: we have removed the constant c1. The point is that any member of that family of trajectories must satisfy that differential equation which is the same as y'= -y/x. We know that the slopes, m1 and m2 of two lines y= m1x+ b1 and y= m1x+ b2 must satisfy m1m2= -1 or m2= -1/m1.
Any curve orthogonal to every member of the family given must have, at each point, y'= dy/dx= -1/(-y/x)= x/y. That separates as ydy= xdx. What is the general solution to that?

For (b) x^2+c_{1}y^3=1
it's a little harder to eliminate c1 but if you rewrite this as x^2y^{-3}+ c_1= y^{-3}, differentiating with respect to x will eliminate c1.
 
There was about three hours between your first and second posts! Do you think we have nothing better to do? (Especially on a Saturday- I spent yesterday hiking in the Shenandoah National Park!)

I appreciate all the help that I've received on this site. Phs. forums is a great resource. But i posted my initial post yesterday and my second post today. I just thought that it was unusual for a post not to be responded to in the amount of time that my post was up. I'm glad you had a good time hiking unlike myself who has spent all of today as well as yesterday getting prepared for the upcoming week.
 
Oops! My bad: there were 12+ about three hours between your first and second posts! Hope my response helped.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top