What are the physics behind quantum computing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sick1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chat Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the physics of quantum computing, with a focus on resources for a college assignment. The participant seeks guidance on understanding quantum mechanics and its application in computing, aiming to structure their 3000-word paper effectively. Suggestions include starting with foundational concepts from Turing and Von Neumann, while emphasizing the quantum aspects of data storage. There is a consensus that a lack of prior computing knowledge may actually be beneficial for focusing on the physics. The participant feels encouraged to begin their research and plans to share their progress.
sick1
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Physics behind Quantum Computing

Hello :) I am interested in the quantum computing, but surprise surprise, I'm interested in the physics behind it. I am 17 and I was wondering of any books or resources that I can read to get an introduction on the physics behind quantum computing as I plan to write a ~3000 word assignment on it. I am a UK college student studying A level physics hoping to apply to University next year. Thanks!

PS. Sorry for the previous name.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two parts of this;
1. you need enough information around the subject of Quantum Computing to complete an A-level assignment.
2. you need additional material to give you a guide for prep for University - what to study to be grounded in quantum computing.

For each of these you have an enormous resource online to soak up - there is no royal road to knowledge: you just have to plow through it. We can recommend resources, and we will, but will have to guess at your learning style.

For the first one especially - the process is more important than the results. The object is to get you into the habit of sifting through far too much information for just the right stuff you need. However - it can be helpful to have someone point you in a useful direction. Therefore - my suggestions here are starting points from which you can discover the answers to your own questions.

Here's a handy overview:
http://www.cs.rice.edu/~taha/teaching/05F/210/news/2005_09_16.htm

... and from IBM:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-quant/index.html

... after reading these you should be able to narrow your search.

... online college courses can be an excellent source.
For the physics aspect you want to concentrate your reading on the difference between the way data is stored in an old-style core memory, a modern RAM chip, and how it may be stored in a quantum computer. i.e. where does the "quantum" part come in? Normal semiconductors rely on quantum mechanics too.
 


Hi Simon, first can I say thank you for your post.

I'm reading through both of those articles as we speak, I've already done a slight bit of research prior to this but most places I look seem to focus on the computing aspect such as bytes. So I plan on doing research on quantum mechanics itself, and use about 1500 words to talk about quantum mechanics, about 500 words to introduce/conclude/write about the history etc, and 1000 words on how the quantum aspect effects the computers and how they work.

This way, I think it turns it into a more general physics topic and allows me to complete it easier, I just hope that there is enough physics in this topic and that I don't spend two weeks researching just to find there isn't enough physics to write about.

What do you think?

PS. I have almost NO computing knowledge and have never done anything to do with computers or the way they work, do you think this will be a big enough setback?
 


That would be an excellent approach to the project :)
You do risk your topic becoming very big - as you try to limit the wordcount to fit QM in a mere 1500 words (for eg) you'll start to see why the articles on your level tend to focus on the computer parts.

Probably what you want to do is start with Turing and Von Neuman (primarily mathematical) definition of a computer and then look for the QM structures, in the abstract, that would satisfy those operations. This will allow you to skip a huge chunk of practical computing theory to focus on fundamentals and still give you a bit of space to summarize the attempted real-world implementation.

I suspect that would secure an A+ - but it is a LOT of work.
Just reading a lot and writing what you think usually works ;)

BTW: lack of computing experience will probably be an advantage.
 


Simon Bridge said:
That would be an excellent approach to the project :)
You do risk your topic becoming very big - as you try to limit the wordcount to fit QM in a mere 1500 words (for eg) you'll start to see why the articles on your level tend to focus on the computer parts.

Probably what you want to do is start with Turing and Von Neuman (primarily mathematical) definition of a computer and then look for the QM structures, in the abstract, that would satisfy those operations. This will allow you to skip a huge chunk of practical computing theory to focus on fundamentals and still give you a bit of space to summarize the attempted real-world implementation.

I suspect that would secure an A+ - but it is a LOT of work.
Just reading a lot and writing what you think usually works ;)

BTW: lack of computing experience will probably be an advantage.

Hi, once again thanks, now I feel I have a pretty good idea of what I am doing thanks to you so I can just get started with the research and see where that takes me :) Like you said, sometimes it's better to just do :) I'll update this thread with how I do and hopefully the end product if you want :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top