What Are the Possible Values of the Larger Number in This Inequality Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter frozonecom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequalities
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves two numbers where their product is less than 340, and one number is three less than the other. The inequality is set up as x(x-3) < 340, leading to the quadratic expression (x+17)(x-20) < 0. The solution set for the larger number, x, is found to be in the interval (-17, 20). To find the corresponding values for the smaller number, y, it is determined that y can be expressed as x-3, resulting in a solution set of (-20, 17) for y. The discussion confirms that the initial calculations for the larger number were correct, and adjustments for the smaller number were appropriately derived.
frozonecom
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The product of two numbers is less than 340. One of the numbers is 3 less than the other. What are the possible values of the larger number?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Hope this is right...

xy < 340
then, because y=x-3
x(x-3) < 340
x^2 -3x -340 < 0
(x+17)(x-20) < 0

Then, by using test numbers I got the interval (-17 , 20) as my solution set.

Now, to get the larger number, do I just add 3 to every number in my possible values for y?
Since, x=y+3 ?

Then, possible values for x (larger number) will be (-15, 23) ?
Or, is what I'm doing wrong
Edit:Okay, by simple checking, 20 x 23 is larger than 340. So I guess I can't just add 3 to every y value I have. So, how do I do it? :)
Edit:I just realized again. Since my inequality is expressed in x (larger number) doesn't that mean I got the solution set for the larger number(which is asked by problem) already?? Please correct me if I'm wrong.
EDIT 3:So sorry for the much edits, but. In order to get the y value (I'm now asking for the smaller number), do I just minus 3 to every element in my solution set, since y is defined to be x-3 ? So, solution set for y= (-20, 17)?? Again, please correct me if I'm wrong.
/HELP!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you are correct. Another way to find the 'smallest' numbers is to express x=y+3 and solve y(y+3)<340 to find the solution set.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top