What Are the Reactions at the Occipital Condyles in a Head Impact Analysis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mpm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Biomechanics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around analyzing the reactions at the occipital condyles during a head impact scenario, specifically after a blow to the chin. The user is uncertain about how to incorporate moment of inertia into their calculations, particularly when neglecting torque. They have used the parallel axis theorem to determine the necessary inertia and are considering summing moments about the condyle to find a reaction force. A suggestion is made to include an image for clarity, as it may aid in providing more accurate assistance. The user estimates a reaction force of about 9500 N and seeks validation on its feasibility.
mpm
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
I have a Force Acceleration analysis that I am un sure of. I have a picture of a skull that is punched/kicked/whatever in the chin.

Problem Statement:

The head shown in the figure below is considered a rigid body. IT rocks on the occipital condyle, C, where an axial force, Fa, and a shear force, V, and a neck torque, To, resist the motion. A blow is applied to the chin at point B at an angle of 63 degrees relative to the horizontal. The initial linear acceleration, a, of the mass center, G, is photographically deteremined to be 140 x gravity. For a head of mass 3.5kg, a moment of inertia of 0.0356 kgm^2 about an axis perpendicular to the sagittal plane is calculate.d WHat are the reactions at the occipital condyles if torque To is neglected?


Ive used the parallel axis theorem to find my actual needed inertia.

I am thinking that maybe I need to do a sum of moments about the condyle to find a reaction force, but I'm not sure if that is right or how to do it. I can't figure out how to incoroporate the moment of inertia.

If anyone can help shed some light for me, I would appreciate it.

I will also be around to answer any questions one might have.

Thanks a bunch.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After doing some research, I have come to the conclusion that if i neglect torque, then I don't even need to worry about moment of inertia. Is this correct? I can't find any equation that relates linear motion with moment of inertia unless there is torque involved.

Is this correct?
 
You may want to put an image on the web, since I don't see any included in your post. Until then, no one will probably be able to help you. :smile:
 
Here is an attachment of what my assignment is.
 

Attachments

  • example.GIF
    example.GIF
    87.7 KB · Views: 651
Last edited:
The answer I came up with is about 9500 N. Is this possible?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top