What Are the Results of Foil Irradiation in a Reactor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TauDay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactor
TauDay
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two pure manganese foils are irradiated in a reactor. Each foil has a mass of
0.0055 g. One foil is irradiated bare in the reactor. The other foil is irradiated with a
cadmium cover in place. The foils are irradiated for 60.0-s, and then allowed to decay for
1800.0-s prior to counting. The activity of the bare and Cd-covered foils, corrected for
detector efficiency and corrected to the end-of-irradiation (EOI) time, are 1.49 x 107 Bq and
2.34 x 106 Bq, respectively. Figure 1 contains an excerpt from the Chart of the Nuclides
which may contain data useful for completing this problem.

Based on the measured results and the data provided, determine the following:
a. (5 min) The saturation activity of each foil (in Bq).
b. (5 min) The epithermal neutron flux (in n/cm2-s) in this reactor position.
c. (5 min) The 2200-m/s neutron flux (in n/cm2-s) in this reactor position.
d. (5 min) The Cd ratio for this position in the core.

Homework Equations



\dot{N} = N \sigma \phi - λN = 0 → A_{sat} = N \sigma \phi

The Attempt at a Solution



see attachment
 

Attachments

  • ChartofNuclides.jpg
    ChartofNuclides.jpg
    42.4 KB · Views: 445
  • IMG_0836.jpg
    IMG_0836.jpg
    22.5 KB · Views: 474
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not generating any responses at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us? Any new findings?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top