MHB What Are the Solutions to These Basic Arithmetic Problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter beefy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arithmetic
beefy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
8(6-5) +10 equal?4(-2)to the 2nd degree plus 8 (-2) + 3(-2) + 6 equal?
3
(1/3) (9) equals?

598%/ 26% what is answer?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
beefy said:
8(6-5) +10 equal?4(-2)to the 2nd degree plus 8 (-2) + 3(-2) + 6 equal?
3
(1/3) (9) equals?

598%/ 26% what is answer?

1) 8(6-5)+10= ?

This is a basic use of the order of operations or PEMDAS as it is commonly taught. You should start by simplifying inside the parentheses, then multiply and lastly add. What do you get?

2) I'm not exactly sure what is being taken to the 2nd degree. You need to be very precise with parenthesis! 4(-2) to the 2nd degree could mean [math]\left( 4(-2) \right)^2[/math] or [math]4 \times (-2)^2[/math] Which one is it? For the second part of this, +8(-2)+3(-2)+6, multiply first then add or subtract.

3) You wrote this:

4(-2)to the 2nd degree plus 8 (-2) + 3(-2) + 6 equal?
3
(1/3) (9) equals?

On the second line, where does that "3" belong? Is that part of a problem or number 3?

4) 598%/26%

Let's say that we have 100 apples. Then 598% of those apples is 5.98*100. Similarly 26% of those 100 apples is 0.26*100. Once we find those and divide what do you get?
 
beefy said:
8(6-5) +10 equal?
8(1)+ 10= 18, of course. I think I learned that kind of arithmetic in third or fourth grade.
4(-2)to the 2nd degree plus 8 (-2) + 3(-2) + 6 equal?
Assuming the "2nd degree" refers only to the "(-2)", that is 4(4)+ 8(-2)+ 3(-2)+ 6= 16- 16- 6+ 6= 0.

3
(1/3) (9) equals?
That "3" is misplaced. Assuming you meant (1/3)3(9), that is (1/27)(9)= 1/9.

598%/ 26% what is answer?
Percentages are NOT numbers and standard arithmetic operations are not defined on percentages. You can interpret percentages as meaning percentages of a specific base, so converting to numbers. That is what Jameson did but that is just one possible interpretation of the question- which is, itself, meaningless.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top