What are the steps to solving this algebraic summation problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Homewoodm01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Summation
Homewoodm01
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Ok I have the answer to a question, all the working is given, however, I'm having trouble following it.

Homework Equations



http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/426/answer.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



I am completely lost, could someone please explain the steps that have been taken, it would really help me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
First line to second: use the definition of \binom x y, then factor out terms that do not depend on x.

<br /> \binom x y= \frac{x!}{y! (x-y)!}<br />

and factor from the sum any term that does not depend on the index of summation, x

Second line to third: shift the origin of summation from y to 0 by replacing the index of summation by x = y. After this the sum becomes

<br /> \sum_{x=0}^\infty \lambda^{x+y} \frac{0.9^x}{x!} = \lambda^y \sum_{x=0}^\infty \frac{(0.9\, \lambda)^x}{x!}<br />

You should be able to fill in the final step yourself.
 
Thankyou very much for your explanation, I've pretty much got my head around it. Am I right i thinking the second line to the third all of the x change to x+y and is that a sort of rule when using summation? Thanks
 
I wouldn't say a rule, but a common bit of work. It's similar to making a substitution in a definite integral.

The original sum in line 2 is

<br /> \sum_{x=y}^\infty \frac{\lambda^x (0.9)^{x-y}}{(x-y)!}<br />

The form of the summand is similar to the infinite series for an exponential, but the starting value isn't zero. Suppose I use a new index
of summation, defined as

<br /> t = x - y \quad \text{ so } \quad x = t+y<br />

Since the original sum begins at x = y, the rewritten form begins at t = x - x = 0. In terms of the new variable the sum looks like

<br /> \sum_{t = 0}^\infty \frac{\lambda^{t+y} (0.9)^t}{t!} = \lambda^y \sum_{t=0}^\infty \frac{\lambda^t (0.9)^t}{t!}<br />

Writing this new form with summation index equal to x gives the form mentioned above.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your time, you've really helped me, I'm confident I understand this now. Thanks again! :biggrin:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top